LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Scituate says no to combining wind turbine studies 

Credit:  By Patrick Ronan | The Patriot Ledger | Posted Mar 30, 2013 | www.patriotledger.com ~~

A Scituate board of health member said he is skeptical about a plan from wind turbine neighbors who want to conduct their own sound study concurrently with one commissioned by the board.

The neighbors, who say the turbine is hurting their health, announced earlier this week they would hire an acoustical engineer to test the noise levels of the turbine. They want their study to be performed on the same nights as the study conducted by Tech Environmental, the firm picked by the health board to study the turbine.

Health board member Michael Vazza said trying to coordinate two tests could be problematic, because both firms may not be available for testing on the same nights. Testing times may change abruptly, the board said, because of testing variables such as rain and wind.

Vazza said he is also worried that a scenario could arise in which one firm accuses the other of testing incorrectly.

“I’m cautious if the board puts themselves out there as the monitor of the logistics (of two tests),” Vazza said during a board discussion of the issue Thursday night. “I just think it muddies it too much.”

In response, board member Francis Lynch said the board will notify the neighbors when Tech Environmental’s testing sites and times have been confirmed, but they will not reschedule to accommodate the neighbors’ firm. The neighbors have yet to hired a firm.

“They’re welcome to come,” Lynch said. “If they can’t come that night, I’m not going to say, ‘Let’s not do it.’”

Tom Thompson of Gilson Road, a spokesman for the neighbors, said Friday that finding mutually agreeable nights for testing should not be difficult because weather patterns are largely predictable, and their firm will be flexible if a makeup date is needed.

Tech Environmental of Waltham will study the turbine using the state’s noise-testing standards. Those standards call for measuring sound in one-second intervals.

The neighbors want to test factors such as low-frequency sound and amplitude modulation, which are measurements not recognized by the state. Neighbors say these measurements are more accurate for turbine noise.

The board’s noise test, set to start in April, will be paid for by Scituate Wind LLC, the turbine owner. Scituate Wind is a joint venture of Solaya Energy and Palmer Capital Corp.

Thursday, the board interviewed Tech Environmental and Noise Control Engineering of Billerica, and then voted to hire Tech. Gordon Deane, principal at Palmer Capital, urged the board to choose Tech because he said they had more experience and their price estimate was about a third lower than Noise Control’s. Deane said the study will cost about $19,900.

The turbine neighbors did not attend Thursday’s health meeting because they oppose the scope of work in the board’s study. Their no-show irked the board.

“They’ve been studying the science of this as much as we have, and I would have appreciated their input on that,” Lynch said.

Thompson said their attendance would have been futile because their suggestions for the study had already been cast aside by the board.

“There wasn’t much more we could bring to the table,” Thompson said. “Our input has frankly been ignored.”

Source:  By Patrick Ronan | The Patriot Ledger | Posted Mar 30, 2013 | www.patriotledger.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky