[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Fight over Scituate’s wind turbine heats up as Town Meeting draws closer 

Credit:  By Jessica Bartlett, Town Correspondent | March 26, 2013 | www.boston.com ~~

The ongoing battle over Scituate’s industrial wind turbine appears headed for the upcoming Town Meeting, as ppponents and proponents step up their arguments over what is fact and what is fiction in the debate.

The argument over whether the turbine is causing health effects has been underway since early 2012, when the turbine was turned on and residents first started complaining of health problems.

Yet with Town Meeting likely to consider a petition to bring the turbine down, both sides have grown more adamant in their opinions.

“We know for a fact that those who haven’t been paying attention, if they have accurate information provided to them on the noise and strobe emanating, and it’s impact on health, [and] you have third party industry experts supporting us, it’s the real story,” said Tom Thompson, a spokesman for the affected residents. “And the more people that become aware, they realize this isn’t an issue of people making stuff up.”

Thompson and several other residents hosted a community meeting on March 23 to convince residents of their side of the story.

To help, residents brought an acoustical engineer – Rick James from E-Coustics – to discuss turbine problems. That presentation was followed up by the personal account of resident Mark McKeever, who lives closest to the turbine, and then followed by a presentation by Dr. Jeffrey Silver with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, who specializes in sleep medicine.

Approximately 100 people attended a resident-sponsored community meeting, available on YouTube.

Over the next couple of weeks, Thompson said the group plans to keep reaching out to people to make them aware of the health problems residents are suffering. The group aims to get Town Meeting to pass a petition to get the turbine taken town.

Though residents initially said they were hosting the meeting to dispel misinformation being promoted by turbine proponents, turbine owner Gordon Dean said it is exactly that misinformation that is problematic.

“What’s concerning to us is, I just finished watching the two hours of it on YouTube. It’s a lot of inaccurate information about the project and about its operating and about the permitting,” Dean said.

Dean said that though the community group is obviously welcome to hold meetings, that in the end, these gatherings will do more harm than good.

Most notably, people begin suffering from what Dean has called the “nocebo” effect, a type of placebo effect that people suffer from when someone suggests they should be negatively affected.

Dean said two recently released studies, including a lab study, indicate that this phenomenon is true.

“The misinformation campaign, trying to get people riled up and trying to make people give complaints for health effects, to a large extent it’s causing the health impacts themselves,” Dean said.

Regardless of what people say, the science behind the turbine is still ongoing. Board of Health members will interview two engineering firms – Tech Environmental and Noise Control Engineering – with the hopes of starting a study within the next two months.

As for the Town Meeting vote, Town Administrator Patricia Vinchesi has said that it would not be binding, though what that means proponents are waiting to see.

“It’s of a concern that they are trying to do this…I don’t know what, if any, effect that has,” Dean said.

Source:  By Jessica Bartlett, Town Correspondent | March 26, 2013 | www.boston.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon