[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Row over wind-farm plan for Midlothian estate 

Credit:  By TOM PETERKIN | Published on Saturday 23 March 2013 | www.scotsman.com ~~

The tranquil beauty of the Pentland and Moorfoot hills has been disturbed by a row over a wind farm proposed for land owned by an aristocratic family.

Plans for the Mount Lothian wind farm on Sir Robert Clerk of Penicuik’s estate have infuriated a neighbouring landowner – the financier Peter de Vink.

Mr de Vink claims Sir Robert is “trousering millions” in wind farm subsidies and maintains that erecting “monstrous” wind turbines in rural Midlothian will wreck unspoilt countryside.

The bitter feud has broken out over a plan to build nine 335ft-high turbines – seven of which are proposed for the Clerk-owned Penicuik estate.

The proposal has received numerous objections, including one from the author Alexander McCall Smith. But it is Mr de Vink who is one of the most vocal critics of what he describes as a “wind factory”, to be sited a couple of miles from his 800-acre estate near the conservation village of Howgate.

Mr de Vink believes it is an unjust system that allows landowners to cash in by renting their land to renewable generators, whose wind farms are subsidised by levying extra cash from ordinary electricity consumers. “It makes the rich richer and the poor poorer,” Mr de Vink said. “It is the opposite of Robin Hood.”

Moreover, Mr de Vink claims that turbines overlooking his property will decrease its value by up up to £1.5 million and said he intends to take legal action against Sir Robert if the plans win approval.

“I will have the estate valued before the wind farm and I will have it valued after the wind farm. The difference has gone into the trousers of Robert Clerk, so I will sue him. My lawyer says it will set a precedent,” said Mr de Vink, who sits on Midlothian Council as an independent.

Mr de Vink claimed Sir Robert, a baronet whose family have lived on the Penicuik Estate for generations, would gain millions in rent from the development. He is also angry that locals have been left tens of thousands of pounds out of pocket after they fought successfully in 2010 to defeat a wind farm at nearby Auchencorth on the Penicuik Estate.

The Wind Prospect Group and EDF Energy Renewables, the companies behind the latest venture, refused to disclose details of the rental arrangement.

Dr John Constable, director of the Renewable Energy Foundation, said that deals varied but the “rule of thumb” was that a lease agreement would specify about £15,000 per turbine per year.

“Thus we can estimate that for nine turbines at Mount Lothian, the annual rental income for the landowners could be about £135,000 and the lifetime rent about £2.7m,” Dr Constable said yesterday.

When Mr de Vink’s claim the landowner would be “trousering millions” was put to Sir Robert, he replied: “I wish I were.” On Mr de Vink’s plan for legal action, Sir Robert said: “I’m not interested in threats like that.” Sir Robert said: “We will be putting at least 25 per cent of it [the money] into projects on the estate, from which the public will benefit very substantially. And also a great deal of money will be going to the local community.”

Source:  By TOM PETERKIN | Published on Saturday 23 March 2013 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky