LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Promise in the wind 

Credit:  By Herald Staff / Boston Herald | March 14, 2013 | bostonherald.com ~~

Cape Wind – which has touted its intention to boost the local economy – has basically pulled a bait and switch. The proposed $2.6 billion project jettisoned its local supplier for the massive steel foundations that will support the giant wind turbines slated for Nantucket Sound.

Cape Wind insists the foundations must be fabricated in Europe because no U.S. firm has the expertise to build them – despite a contention by a local supplier that it spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to learn how to do it right.

Carl C. Horstmann, president of Mass Tank, which signed a non-binding (as it turned out) letter of intent with Cape Wind for the project, made the disclosures in a letter to federal energy officials after his former business partners backed out of the deal.

“Cape Wind used our intended participation to garner public support,” Horstmann wrote. He thought “we were initiating a mutually beneficial business arrangement that would pay dividends to the state and the region.

“But now I can only conclude I was wrong and question Cape Wind’s commitment to Mass Tank and the local manufacturing jobs was ever made in good faith.”

Horstmann said the deal would have created 150 to 300 new jobs.

The point is that taxpayers, who are subsidizing this project, and ratepayers – who will pay the higher costs ad infinitum – at least counted on some payback for local businesses and workers.

More importantly, having broken one promise, what’s to keep Cape Wind from breaking the rest of them?

Source:  By Herald Staff / Boston Herald | March 14, 2013 | bostonherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky