[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Voters blow away Reading Township wind project  

Credit:  by Jack Butler on March 14, 2013 | The Hillsdale Collegian | www.hillsdalecollegian.com ~~

For now, wind power will stay out of Reading Township.

That was the decision of residents of Reading, a township 11 miles southwest of Hillsdale, in a referendum on Feb. 26, the vote followed a long, fierce debate over Duke Energy’s proposed Hillsdale Windpower Project. Reading Township Supervisor Jon Burrell said it was an “overwhelming” vote against the project.

The project would have encompassed approximately 12,000 acres of land in Allen, Cambria, and Reading Townships of Hillsdale County, according to a document on Duke Energy’s Hillsdale Windpower Project website. The document also said that the project would create many jobs, both short-term construction and long-term maintenance, and provide tax revenue.

“What ‘no’ means is that township voters rejected ordinance changes pertaining to industrial wind farms, mostly relating to noise,” Burrell said. “In August, the Reading Township Board amended the ordinances to make them more permissible, which would have allowed Duke to put up more wind towers.”

The Zoning Ordinance of Reading Township, a publicly available document, “as it is is fairly restrictive,” Burrell said. Voters have the chance to vote on any changes to zoning regulations through referendum.

Burrell said that, although the vote was in February, Duke Energy had abandoned the project in November 2012, citing inadequate infrastructure in a letter to local officials.

“There was no nearby transmission line with enough capacity. The existing one was insufficient,” Burrell said. “The thumb area [of Michigan] is where most of these projects are really going.”

The letter went on to maintain the possibility for returning to develop in seven to 10 years.

The Windpower Project had engendered significant debate over the past few months, with several organizations joining the fray. “Save Reading,” one such organization, formed in the beliefs that “the many unintended consequences of wind energy are being significantly downplayed or outright ignored by the power company…and our township government has not adequately addressed our concerns,” according to its mission statement.

The Interstate Informed Citizens Coalition, Inc., “a non-profit corporation dedicated to raising public awareness of the potential impacts from the construction of industrial wind turbines in our region,” also participated in public debate, encouraging its members to call their elected officials and attend town meetings. Representatives of the group even appeared at Mark Steyn’s public lecture at Hillsdale last spring.

As for the future of wind energy in Reading Township, Burrell said that the vote had made it uncertain.

“[The vote] really did finalize it. This project was bigger than just Reading,” Burrell said. “Reading was just the centerpiece. Duke wanted to go into Allen and Cambria Townships, but it wasn’t possible without the approval of Reading.

“The wind project has gone away and will probably never come back.”

Source:  by Jack Butler on March 14, 2013 | The Hillsdale Collegian | www.hillsdalecollegian.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.