[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bernard Matthews told to re-plant trees felled at farm 

Credit:  BBC News | 11 March 2013 | www.bbc.co.uk ~~

Poultry producer Bernard Matthews will be ordered to replant more than 300 trees felled at one of its farms.

The company cut down 342 mature trees at Oulton, near Aylsham, Norfolk, on a site where it hopes to erect a 262ft (80m) wind turbine.

The Forestry Commission was called in to investigate and said the trees had been cut down without a licence. It will order the re-planting.

Bernard Matthews Farms said it had yet to hear from the Forestry Commission.

The company planted the trees as part of conditions imposed when planning permission for turkey sheds was granted in 1991, but felled them last month.

‘Made a mistake’

Steve Scott, area director for the Forestry Commission, said: “As a result, we will issue a re-stocking notice which will make the owners re-plant the trees in situ.

“They have to maintain those trees for a period of 10 years and they do that at their own expense.

“This is an enforceable notice. We can take them to court if necessary, but my understanding is the owners wish to replant these trees and they realise they have made a mistake.”

A spokesman for Bernard Matthews Farms said: “We have not yet received any official advice from the Forestry Commission, but we have an excellent working relationship with the commission, having planted 385 acres of woodland across our farms and community areas since 1992.

“We would, of course, welcome any guidance they have on this matter.”

The company has submitted a planning application to Broadland District Council for the turbine.

It said the trees had been felled following an ecology assessment of the site that found they posed a “small potential risk to local bat populations”.

Campaign group No Oulton Turbine described the felling as an act of “environmental vandalism”.

Spokeswoman Daisy Turville-Petre said: “We really can’t see where they could possibly replace the same acreage as they have razed to the ground.

“You can’t chop down healthy trees without licence, without warning and without any care for the community and expect there not to be consequences.”

Source:  BBC News | 11 March 2013 | www.bbc.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon