LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind bill shakes off GOP amendments; Final vote could come Friday 

Credit:  by Holly Nunn, Staff writer | March 08, 2013 | www.gazette.net ~~

In its first time on the Senate floor, Gov. Martin O’Malley’s bill to incentivize an offshore wind development survived six amendments lobbed at it by Republican opponents Thursday.

Concerns from opponents ranged from liability for ratepayers should the project fail or go over projected costs to ensuring that as much infrastructure as possible is located in Maryland when the project is built.

The bill would create a process by which the Public Service Commission can evaluate and approve a proposal by a developer to build a 200-megawatt wind farm in an area 10 to 30 miles off the coast of Ocean City. The commission could not approve such a proposal if it predicts increased monthly costs to customers of $1.50 for average households or 1.5 percent of a commercial customer’s monthly bill.

As amended by the House, the bill has an exception for farms that use more than 3,000 kilowatts per month, as well as for major industrial consumers that use more than 75 million kilowatts.

The bill, which was passed by the House in February, will be taken up today for further amendments and could receive a final vote.

This is the third year O’Malley has proposed similar legislation, but the first year it has made it to the full Senate for a vote. In previous years, the bill died in committee, but Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Dist. 27) of Chesapeake Beach changed committee membership to ensure that the proposal would make it out of the Senate Finance Committee.

The extra costs – necessitated by the high cost of developing the infrastructure needed to produce wind energy offshore, including the construction of about 40 400-foot turbines – will not show up on customers’ bills until the farm is producing energy, which could be 2017 at the earliest, administration officials said.

“This is the most expensive energy in the world. In the world,” said Senate Minority Leader E.J. Pipkin (R-Dist. 36) of Elkton. “And we’re creating a carve-out for it.”

Source:  by Holly Nunn, Staff writer | March 08, 2013 | www.gazette.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon