LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Developer, landowner appealing Passadumkeag Windpark decision 

Credit:  By Nick Sambides Jr., BDN Staff | February 27, 2013 | Bangor Daily News | bangordailynews.com ~~

GRAND FALLS TOWNSHIP, Maine – The developer and landowner of a proposed industrial wind site on Passadumkeag Mountain are appealing the state’s rejection of a project permit, officials said Wednesday.

The Board of Environmental Protection will hear appeals filed by Passadumkeag Windpark LLC and landowner Penobscot Forest LLC of Maine Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Patricia Aho’s rejection of the plan to build a 14-turbine site on the mountain.

The DEP decision said the developer met the majority of the department’s criteria for the project, including that it would not unreasonably harm any significant wildlife habitat, interfere with natural water flow, violate any state water quality laws or unreasonably cause or increase flooding to adjacent areas.

However, the ruling indicated the wind turbines would have a negative effect on the scenic nature of the lake. The views of Saponac Lake from the mountain are “one of a kind,” DEP spokeswoman Samantha Depoy-Warren said when Aho took the staff’s recommendation and issued the rejection in November.

The rejection was the first issued by the DEP regarding a wind project, Depoy-Warren said.

Penobscot Forest and Passadumkeag Windpark officials argue that the criteria for the rejection was flawed, the project’s impact on the lake viewshed is overstated and that the decision adversely affects those companies.

“They just basically disagree with us,” said James R. Beyer, regional licensing and compliance manager with the Maine DEP.

Attorney P. Andrew Hamilton of Bangor law firm Eaton Peabody filed the appeal. He did not immediately return a message seeking comment on Wednesday.

The DEP’s board will hear the appeal March 21. A time and place for the hearing has not yet been set, Beyer said.

The site’s turbines would be 459 feet from base to extended blade tip. Each turbine would generate 3 megawatts of electricity, according to the company’s proposal. Electricity would be collected in a 34.5-kilovolt line to run about 17 miles from Passadumkeag Ridge along Greenfield Road through Summit Township, Greenfield Township and Greenbush.

The project would include a substation in Greenbush and a connection to an existing 115-kilovolt transmission line on Greenbush Road.

Residents opposing the project and anti-wind-power advocates have said the project would blight the mountain landscape, reduce property values, severely damage the tourism-based businesses in the area, threaten wildlife and bother residents with the vibrations, noise and strobe effect the turbines would generate or use. They also have raised the possibility of turbine malfunctions sparking forest fires.

Penobscot County commissioners delayed approving a tax break deal for the project, saying they wanted to see how the DEP would handle the project.

DEP is confident the board will uphold the decision, Depoy-Warren said.

“Anyone who looked at the picture agreed that there was an unreasonable adverse impact from this project,” Depoy-Warren said. “Anyone who utilized that resource professionally as a guide or [as a resident] lauded our decision.”

Bangor Daily News writer Alex Barber contributed to this account.

Source:  By Nick Sambides Jr., BDN Staff | February 27, 2013 | Bangor Daily News | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky