[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm developer appeals, says project can meet state noise standard 

Credit:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel | Feb. 25, 2013 | www.jsonline.com ~~

Developers of the only major wind project on the drawing board in Wisconsin are asking the state Public Service Commission to rethink its recent split decision blocking a construction permit for the Highland Wind Farm.

The $250 million project stalled when the commission, on a 2-1 vote, decided to deploy a more conservative standard for wind turbine noise limits.

The commission refused to allow the project to proceed, because the state noise limit might be exceeded on occasion for several homes near the project.

But Emerging Energies Inc. of Hubertus said the project does not need to be redesigned to accommodate the noise concerns. Instead, the developer said it planned to preprogram turbines that could cause noise problems to power down if wind speeds would cause the limits to be exceeded.

The developer urged the PSC, in an “emergency request” filed Friday afternoon, to allow the development to proceed without requiring the developer to start over on the project.

Groups opposed to and supporting the project have been asked to weigh in on the Highland Wind Farm request by Wednesday. Highland is asking the commission to take up the matter at its weekly meeting on Friday.

PSC spokeswoman Kristin Ruesch said it was premature to say whether the agency would take another look at the project. The commission will wait to review the responses to Highland’s request, she said.

Emerging Energies says it has worked for six years and invested nearly $2 million to develop the project, which would be located in St. Croix County, northwest of Eau Claire.

Opponents weigh in

Opponents of the project said the commission does not need to rethink its stance. They said that money the developer has invested in the project shouldn’t be a concern for the PSC.

“They assumed that risk, and if it does not pay off for them, that is their problem,” Forest Voice said. “The public interest is not harmed by that loss.”

Separately, a coalition of towns in Sheboygan County – where Emerging Energies has proposed a smaller wind farm – urged the commission to reject the request. The commission shouldn’t take into account the developer’s past investment and allow a “rush to judgment,” the coalition said.

The coalition cited concerns about low-frequency noise and health concerns at the Shirley wind project in Brown County. Those concerns should prompt the commission to bar the Highland project and other wind farms until they are addressed, the group said.

Meanwhile, the green energy advocacy group Renew Wisconsin also weighed in Monday, noting the PSC had allowed Milwaukee-based We Energies to curtail certain turbines to comply with nighttime noise limits at the Glacier Hills Wind Park in Columbia County.

“In fact, we believe that operational curtailment is the most effective tool available to a wind-power project operator for reducing sonic output from individual wind turbines to allowable levels,” Renew Wisconsin policy director Michael Vickerman said.

Fast action sought

The developer is seeking quick action from the commission because it wants its wind farm to be considered by Xcel Energy Inc., which recently announced it was seeking bids for additional wind power to serve its customers in Minnesota and Wisconsin.

Xcel operates a utility based in Eau Claire but in essence operates its utilities as one system serving parts of both states.

In its filing, Highland said it would be a waste of potential economic development to keep the project from proceeding on a technical matter that can be easily addressed.

Opponents of the project are concerned about noise, shadow flicker and the potential loss of property value associated with the project.

But Highland said the project as submitted complies with the state’s wind siting rules, which specifically allow developers to comply with the noise standard by curtailing production at certain times.

Corrections and Clarifications

An article Tuesday in the Business section about the proposed Highland Wind Farm in St. Croix County misstated who asked the state Public Service Commission to deny an appeal of the project’s rejection. The denial request was by the Wisconsin Citizens Coalition, not a coalition of Sheboygan County towns. |

March 1, 2013 |


Source:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel | Feb. 25, 2013 | www.jsonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky