[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine plans ‘stealing soul’ of Cumbria 

Credit:  By Rowena Mason, Political Correspondent | The Telegraph | 4 February 2013 | www.telegraph.co.uk ~~

Britain’s most beautiful landscapes are at risk of being “disfigured and scarred” by up to 400 new wind turbines in the county of the Lake District, the head of Cumbria council has warned.

Eddie Martin, the local Conservative leader, said the region is at risk of being ruined by politicians “determined to steal Cumbria’s soul in the name of green energy”.

In a letter to John Hayes, a Tory energy minster, he called on the Government to drop its “fixation” with turbines as the “jewel in the crown of Britain’s landscapes” has reached saturation point.

He also described the Coalition’s commitment to localism as a “cruel joke”, as local communities feel powerless to stop wind farms being built in their areas.

Anti-wind campaigners claim Cumbria hosts as many wind turbines as all the other counties of England combined.

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, Mr Martin said there is a “very very strong feeling in Cumbria that we are taking more than our fair share” of wind farms.

Mr Martin said local people feel helpless as they are “gradually encircled with pillars of steel” on countryside right next to the protected Lake District national parks.

“You can’t have pick and mix localism,” he said. “Either we give communities the power to make a decision or we do not but we can’t play at it. If localism is to mean anything, it must mean more than they appear to do so at the moment.”

He said district councils in his area are struggling because it costs them up to £50,000 when they lose planning appeals against unwanted turbines.

“There’s something wrong in the state of Cumbria and elsewhere, I think,” he said. “It’s a massive growing movement – the imposition of wind farms on a unwilling community that feels disenfranchised because it cannot effectively reject them.

“I know there are many other communities in England that feel the same way we do.”

Mr Martin said he had not had a reply from Mr Hayes, who has previously promised to stop the spread of wind farms across the countryside – before being slapped down by more senior ministers.

His comments came as Edward Davey, the Energy Secretary, defended the Government’s ambitions to see more wind turbines built, despite frequent local opposition.

He told LBC Radio that people “often” support wind farms as they can bring “community benefits” when developers agree to spend money on the local area. This can help “turn the tide of local opinion” in favour of wind energy, he said.

A spokesman for the Department of Energy said Mr Hayes would reply to the letter.

She added that wind turbines “should always be appropriately sited, and the views of local communities taken into account”.

“Specific onshore wind planning applications are a matter for the relevant planning authority. Every area should have an up-to-date local plan which sets out local people’s views of how they wish their community to develop against which planning applications, and planning appeals, will be judged. We are currently consulting on ways of making sure local communities feel the benefit of hosting wind farms in their areas.”

It comes as a new report argues that Britain and the US are spending too much money on subsidising wind power.

A study by the Adam Smith Institute and America’s Reason Foundation found heavy investment in wind power is “misguided”.

“Wind energy will never be suited as the lone or primary source of grid electricity due to its variable nature and will not deliver the environmental benefits expected,” the report said.

Source:  By Rowena Mason, Political Correspondent | The Telegraph | 4 February 2013 | www.telegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky