[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Feathers fly in Shetland wind farm development row  

Credit:  By Dave Finlay | The Scotsman | 29 January 2013 | www.scotsman.com ~~

A rare bird has landed at the heart of a legal challenge involving the Scottish Government’s decision to grant the go-ahead for a wind farm project.

Campaigners maintain that there was a breach of a European Birds Directive in the approval for the Viking wind farm on Shetland.

Sustainable Shetland has raised a judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh of the Scottish ministers’ ruling last year granting consent for the 103-turbine project .

Sir Crispin Agnew of Lochnaw QC, for the group, told the court yesterday: “One of the main legal contentions is how the Scottish Government has approached the Birds Directive and we say that is an error of law.”

Protesters are seeking to have the decision set aside and maintain that a public inquiry should have been held and that the ministers failed to properly take account of the impact of the development on the whimbrel, a migratory wading bird.

The court heard that 95 per cent of the British population of whimbrels breed on Shetland.

Sir Crispin said: “Shetland holds a substantial portion of the British population, but it has been in decline in numbers.”

The Viking project was hailed by energy minister Fergus Ewing as providing enormous benefits to the people of Shetland.

Sir Crispin told Lady Clark of Calton that Shetland islands council head of planning had recommended refusal of the project as it was contrary to a development plan, but the council decided not to oppose the application.

He said: “It is a judgement that has to be made against the background that energy does not trump environment.”

The counsel said Scottish Natural Heritage had objected to the project maintaining there was a high likelihood of a significant adverse impact on the wader.

Source:  By Dave Finlay | The Scotsman | 29 January 2013 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: