[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Green belt campaigners win fight against weather mast 

Credit:  Sunderland Echo | 29 January 2013 | www.sunderlandecho.com ~~

Campaigners are celebrating after plans for a 50-metre meteorological mast on green belt land were rejected.

Residents were furious when a renewable energy firm proposed to build the mast close to Laverick Hall Farm in Laverick Lane, West Boldon.

The project was put forward by Empirica Investments Ltd, a North Yorkshire firm specialising in renewable energy projects – including wind turbines.

But councillors rejected the plans at a meeting yesterday, expressing concerns that the mast could trigger a bid for a wind turbine farm development on the site at a later date.

Green belt campaigner Ron Smith, 83, of Durham Drive, was among 150 people to sign a petition against the siting of the mast.

He said: “As a resident, I am very pleased that the committee has taken this decision.

“We bought our homes here because this was green belt land and we want it to stay that way.”

Campaigners also staged a successful fight against a controversial business park scheme on the same green belt six years ago.

The latest mast bid was thrown out by a South Tyneside Council planning committee.

At the committee meeting, Labour’s Coun Alan Smith said he believed the intention was to establish a wind turbine farm on the site.

He said: “What is the point on giving this the go-ahead when a wind turbine will be turned down?

“My argument is that it had to be established that there were ‘very special circumstances’ for this to be approved, and these are not.”

Independent Coun Steve Harrison added: “This was yet another attack on green belt after the fight against the business park.

“This was just an application to gather information for a wind farm, and very few people want to live next to a wind turbine.

“Where they have been placed in other parts of the country, peaceful lives have been shattered and the price of homes devalued.

“I’d reiterate what the council leader said, that nothing would be built on that land as long as this administration was in place.”

Labour’s Bill Brady, who represents Whiteleas, added: “There was only one reason for this application and that was to find out if it was viable for a wind farm.”

Source:  Sunderland Echo | 29 January 2013 | www.sunderlandecho.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky