Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Minnesota AG sues wind energy firm for cheating farmers
Credit: by Elizabeth Dunbar, Minnesota Public Radio | January 25, 2013 | minnesota.publicradio.org ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Several Minnesota farmers are out hundreds of thousands of dollars after they say a wind energy developer failed to keep its promises when installing small-scale wind turbines on their property.
The company, Renewable Energy SD, was named in a lawsuit filed Friday by Attorney General Lori Swanson. According to the lawsuit, the company told farmers the wind turbines would pay for themselves through federal grant money from federal stimulus that Congress passed in 2009 and a state electricity buy-back law.
But many of the farmers had their wind turbines malfunction, and the company has failed to fix or replace the malfunctioning equipment, the farmers allege in the lawsuit. In other cases, the turbines haven’t delivered the power the company promised, the farmers said.
Although the company is based in South Dakota, its president, Shawn Dooling, lives in Minnesota. Reached on Friday, Dooling said he is still reviewing the lawsuit and had no immediate comment.
Swanson said Dooling has bought several expensive cars, such as a 2010 Ferrari, since entering agreements with the farmers, and that both his name and his company’s name are on the cars’ titles.
Several of the farmers who are part of Swanson’s lawsuit attended a news conference on Friday.
“We’re frustrated,” said Harlan Jacobson, of Ashby, Minn., who said he spent $82,000 on a wind turbine and was told the federal grant would take care of the rest. Jacobson said he started working with the company in March of 2010. When the turbine was finally installed in December 2010, it didn’t work, he said.
Even though the company had promised to service the turbine, Jacobson said officials didn’t keep their word and so last April, he hired his own contractor to fix it. While the turbine is now working, it’s only bringing in up to a quarter of the $800 in monthly revenue the company had promised, he said.
“It’s produced a little bit, but hardly enough to pay the maintenance that we’ve taken out of our own pocket to make it work,” he said.
Marvin Jensen, of Kensington, Minn., said he paid $245,000 for a turbine three years ago and is still waiting.
“Wind turbines work, it’s just that we got in with a real shady outfit I guess,” he said. “What it amounts to is I got a $200,000 deer stand, I guess.”
Swanson said 15 farmers are part of the lawsuit, and she said her office is still getting complaints about the company. She said at least four other farmers have already filed and settled lawsuits with Renewable Energy SD on their own.
“A lot of these people, when they first started experiencing problems, they said, ‘could I have a refund?'” Swanson said. “They were told, ‘no, you can’t have a refund, you can double the investment and buy something else.’ … At the same time, assets were being acquired that I think most people would consider to be lavish.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |
Share: