[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Dixfield Planning Board discusses changes to wind ordinance  

Credit:  Matthew Daigle, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | January 3, 2013 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

DIXFIELD – The Planning Board reviewed and discussed edits to the town’s wind ordinance Thursday night at the Town Hall.

Before the workshop began, board member Tom Child made a motion to approve alternate board member Richard Pickett as a participating member for the workshop because Cindy Paine was absent.

Child said their duty was to “make any changes we see fit and make recommendations that we can place before the selectmen.” He also requested that any public participation be shelved until the next scheduled Planning Board meeting.

“There’s so much to do and to get through tonight,” Child said. “Right now, this is just a workshop to go over the changes. Any comments from the public about the ordinance will be welcome during our regularly scheduled meeting on the 17th.”

The Planning Board addressed edits made to the ordinance by lawyer Kristen Collins and discussed whether or not they were acceptable. One area in the ordinance the board questioned is where Collins deleted a section stating wind turbines could not impede the “health, safety and quiet enjoyment of residents.” Instead, she replaced it with a sentence stating the wind turbines could not “create any unwanted noise.”

Child said the edit jumped out at him since he couldn’t figure out why she simplified that particular sentence.

Pickett suggested they email her about the edit.

“She might have a legitimate reason for changing it that we’re not aware of,” he said.

The Planning Board also discussed the fact that the town’s Comprehensive Plan may need to be edited after the ordinance is voted through so that there are no contradictions between the two.

The discussion arose after Child noted that the ordinance gave instructions to check the Comprehensive Plan to see which areas in Dixfield are specified as “scenic or a special resource.” A Dixfield resident attending the meeting said that when the Comprehensive Plan was drawn up, it suggested that there may be scenic areas to protect, but it didn’t designate any specific areas.

The Planning Board will meet again Jan. 17 to discuss the remainder of the wind ordinance.

Source:  Matthew Daigle, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | January 3, 2013 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.