[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Quail Brush developer sells to the Carlyle Group  

Credit:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | January 2, 2013 | eastcountymagazine.org ~~

Cogentrix has sold a majority of its North American assets, including Quail Brush GENCO (applicant for the Quail Brush power plant near Mission Trails) to subsidiaries of Carlyle Entities, managed by the Carlyle Group.   View letter to  California Energy Commission with details.   

Cogentrix had argued that the Quail Brush gas-fired “peaker” power plant was necessary to meet energy needs when there is now enough wind or sunshine for large-scale wind and solar projects.

Carlyle’s 2009 Annual Report confirms that Carlyle also founded Pattern Energy, developer of the Ocotillo Express Wind project, a site that has drawn criticism for minimal wind resources.  But now, if Quail Brush is built, Carlyle stands to profit whether the wind blows or not.

Two California Public Utilities officials have recommended denial of Quail Brush, concluded it is not necessary to meet our region’s power needs.  But the full CPUC could yet overrule that recommendation.

The Carlyle Group is one of the nation’s largest and most politically connected private equity firms. Carlyle’s founder, Frank Carlucci, is former Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and former U.S. Secretary of Defense.    Over the years it has employed former president George H.W. Bush and former British Prime Minister John Major. The company is known for its military contracting businesses and also holds major stakes in hedge funds and other interests. Carlyle investors in the past have included the bin Ladin family.

But Carlyle has also been accused of ethics violations and other shady dealings.

Carlyle entered into a joint venture with Riverstone LLC, which acquired Pattern’s predecessor.  The deal was described by ABC News as a pay to play” corruption scandal.”  Carlyle paid $20 million to resolve the investigation by New York’s Attorney General.

Riverstone’s founder, David Leuschen is a former director and managing director at Goldman-Sachs.

Goldman-Sachs also owned Cogentrix prior to the acquisition by Carlyle.

Carlucci, founder of the Carlyle Group, has a long history of controversy dating back to when he was stationed in the Congo with the CIA, when rumors surfaced accusing Carlucci of having a hand in the assassination of a Congolese official; Carlucci and the CIA have denied this. For details see the Encyclopedia of the Central Intelligence Agency. The book The Iron Triangle: Inside the Secret World of the Carlyle Group claims that Carlucci and/or Carlyle entities have been accused of arms scandals and bribery.

The San Diego City Council, Santee’s City Council, numerous environmental groups and citizens have voiced virtually unanimous opposition to the Quail Brush power plant. Santee Mayor Randy Voepel and San Diego Mayor Bob Filner have also voiced strong opposition. 

Serious questions are now being raised about the viability of the Ocotillo Express Wind project. Videos taken daily since the project went online in December, shot by an engineer who resides in Ocotillo who has long predicted that the site would not have adequate wind, appear to show virtually no wind, with turbines standing idle. (See links below). 

If the same company owns both the wind turbines and the gas-powered peaker backup plant, however, then if Quail Brush is built, Carlyle stands to profit even if its wind site in Ocotillo lacks adequate wind resources.













Source:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | January 2, 2013 | eastcountymagazine.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.