LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

New Era still working on wind farm details 

Credit:  By John Weiss | The Post-Bulletin | Dec 24, 2012 | www.postbulletin.com ~~

ST. PAUL – A company developing a major wind farm in Goodhue County is still working on finalizing its local contracts but it will have enough profits going to local people that it will qualify for special state rates, the company’s owners has told the state.

Peter Mastic, the owner of New Era Wind Farm LLC, replied to 11 questions from the Public Utilities Commission about what effect his buying the company would have, including if it will qualify for Community-Based Energy Development status that gives more money for the power. That status requires at least the majority of profits go to state groups, while Mastic is based out of Nevada.

Those opposing the plan have called on the commission to revoke C-BED, including the Goodhue County Board that recently asked the PUC for review.

In his reply filed Monday, Mastic asks for more time to get final details about financing and basically repeats what he said before – that his buying the company that became New Era Wind Farm LLC does not change its basic structure.

“The new ownership structure has no impact on New Era’s ability to maintain its C-BED status,” Mastic wrote.

Mastic says that New Era will be able to hook up to the Midwest Independent System Operator system that controls transmission lines. Again, he says that the change “in the name of the legal entity does not affect the validity of the MISO contracts.”

He also says the company’s contract with Xcel Energy, which could buy the energy, remains intact.

Source:  By John Weiss | The Post-Bulletin | Dec 24, 2012 | www.postbulletin.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky