[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Anger after plans approved for wind monitoring masts  

Credit:  By Joanna Morris | The Northern Echo | 23rd December 2012 | www.thenorthernecho.co.uk ~~

Controversial proposals for two 60-metre tubular steel wind monitoring masts have been agreed – despite protests by angry residents.

The masts – one to the north-east of the telecommunications mast at Park Farm and the second on land north-west of the former depot site in Wilton Lane, both near Guisborough – were approved by six votes to four at a recent meeting of Redcar and Cleveland Council planning committee.

Residents have been rallying together in reaction to an increasing number of applications connected with wind farms being submitted to Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council in the East Cleveland area.

Members of a number of local campaign groups protested outside the meeting in Belmont House, Guisborough.

At the meeting, Councillor Mary Lanigan said: “We have no choice. If we voted against it our decision would be overturned.

“I understand what residents are saying – I don’t like wind turbines anymore than anyone else – but when an application for wind turbines comes in then that will be decided by this committee and residents and the community and everybody else will be able to have their say.”

Guisborough resident John Larkin said later: “The decision was a farce. It’s a back-door way to get wind turbines in and they have not taken into consideration what the people want.”

Another resident, Alison Martin, said: “I think it is awful. It is going to industrialise a beautiful part of the countryside.”

The application had attracted 97 letters or emails of objection with a wide variety of concerns raised, including fears the plan would open to the door to more applications for wind farms; the masts would have a detrimental impact on the landscape; would be too close to the village of Stanghow, and cause potential noise problems.

The application was recommended for approval by council officers.

A report put before members concluded: “The slender design of the mast and associated guys is considered to result in a form of development that will not have a significant impact upon the character and appearance of the landscape.”

In September, the committee refused an application for a 90m-high wind turbine near Kilton Thorpe village in East Cleveland after concerns were raised by members that the scheme would have a negative impact on the local environment.

Source:  By Joanna Morris | The Northern Echo | 23rd December 2012 | www.thenorthernecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.