[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windfarm opponents call for council protest  

Credit:  By Kaye Nicolson | The Press and Journal | 3 December 2012 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Councillors are being urged to object to proposals for a windfarm on a prominent Moray hillside.

The move would prompt a costly public inquiry into Vento Ludens’s plans to build 19 410ft turbines at Brown Muir, three miles from Rothes, off the A941 Elgin-Rothes road.

The proposals have attracted vehement opposition from campaigners, and a petition attracted more than 2,000 signatures.

Now, local authority planning officials have claimed the visual impact of the windfarm would be “unacceptable and contrary to planning policy”.

Due to its scale, the plans have been submitted to the Scottish Government rather than Moray Council – but the authority is entitled to give a consultation response to ministers.

A report, which will be discussed by members of the planning and regulatory services committee tomorrow, calls on councillors to lodge an objection to Scottish ministers.

The document, written by principal planning officer Angus Burnie, outlines the “unacceptable landscape and visual impacts that would arise from the location, height and number of turbines on Brown Muir” as key grounds for objection.

Other remarks include the fact that Brown Muir is a “landmark hill which should be protected” and the claim that the proposal would not be a “sensitive development of renewable energy”.

Mr Burnie also recommends that the local authority ask to be consulted again if there are any changes to the current proposals.

He says the objection would prompt a public inquiry, which would be costly and time-consuming. Derek Ross, a member of the Save the Brown Muir action group and resident at nearby Glen of Rothes, said an inquiry would be a “waste of public money”.

The group has spoken out about the potential visual impact of the project, as well as the effect it could have on tourism.

Mr Ross said yesterday: “If councillors do vote against it, it clearly means it’s not wanted, so why waste our public money on a public inquiry? It’s obvious that the people in this area have had enough – it is saturated with wind turbines.”

He added: “The developers are not from the area. They don’t understand that people love Moray and they love where they stay.”

Jay Butler, of Vento Ludens, has said that the company embarked on an “exhaustive process of preparation and pre-application consultation”.

He told the Press and Journal previously that the firm was carefully considering all representations made by local groups, including Innes and Elgin community councils.

Talks will also be held tomorrow on the results of a recent consultation on Moray’s windfarm guidance.

A report – written by another of the council’s principal planning officers, Gary Templeton – outlines a raft of issues raised by the public and other agencies.

Cumulative impact, the importance of community funds and concerns about the Scottish Government “overriding local democracy” were all highlighted.

There was also concern about the council’s “inconsistent decision-making”.

The planning and regulatory services committee will also discuss the proposed Telford, MacColl and Stevenson offshore windfarm developments at tomorrow’s meeting in the council chambers.

Source:  By Kaye Nicolson | The Press and Journal | 3 December 2012 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.