[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Turbine refusal ‘should warn developers off heritage coast’  

Credit:  Yorkshire Post | 29 November 2012 | www.yorkshirepost.co.uk ~~

Campaigners claim the rejection of plans to build a wind turbine at an East Yorkshire village have set a precedent that will help protect the Flamborough Heritage Coast against future development.

Permission to build a single turbine, measuring 80ft to the tip of the blade, on land south east of Manor Farm in Bempton was turned down in the face of opposition from residents, two parish councils, Bridlington Town Council, and the Ministry of Defence; the latter because it would 
cause “unacceptable interference” to its radar station at Staxton Wold.

But although councillors took into to account the MoD’s objections and evidence about the turbine’s potential impact on barn owls in the area, they also heeded concerns about its impact on the coast.

Bempton resident David Hinde said it was a significant victory in the campaign against turbines on the coast.

“That’s what we lobbied councillors at the meeting for, so it was properly rejected as it should be,” he said.

“It basically answers everything we’ve been fighting for on the heritage coast.

“It provides a good precedent for refusing other turbine applications on the heritage coast, and should put them off choosing the heritage coast villages.”

He added: “We couldn’t have done it without the support of the villages of Bempton, Flamborough and Speeton, the parish councils and Bridlington Town Council.”

The application followed the withdrawal of earlier plans for a two-turbine development.

Source:  Yorkshire Post | 29 November 2012 | www.yorkshirepost.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter