[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Mary O’Donnell turbine shutdown on horizon?  

Credit:  By Kathryn Gallerani | Wicked Local Kingston | Posted Nov 23, 2012 | www.wickedlocal.com ~~

KINGSTON – Developer Mary O’Donnell may face financial ramifications for failing to meet requirements for buffer restoration on her turbine property.

The Planning Board voted 3-1 Monday night to refer the case to Zoning Enforcement Officer Paul Armstrong for potential sanctions, including fines and shutdown of her turbines.

Planning Board member Ron Gleason did not support referring her to Armstrong, but Acting Chairman Michael Ruprecht said it’s a necessary action to take.

“I think this will put a fire under your behind,” he said.

Gleason said he would prefer to work with O’Donnell because she has made some of the changes the board wants to see on her plans for the property. He said shutting down the turbines would have financial ramifications because of the renewable energy agreement between the town and O’Donnell.

Ruprecht said he does not want the board to have to rescind subdivision approval and doesn’t know that stopping the turbines would financially be in the town’s best interests. However, he said he believes that fines for non-compliance with the conditions set by the board would be a viable option.

O’Donnell insists she keeps trying to do what is requested of her by the board, but the requirements keep changing.

“It serves me no purpose to be at odds with you,” she said. “I keep trying to do what you want.”

Planning Board member David Gavigan asked Town Planner Tom Bott directly: Are the plans O’Donnell just submitted to the board adequate? Bott said the board’s consulting landscape architect says no.

One of the issues the board has with the buffer restoration plan is the scale so they can better judge the adequacy of the buffer. The plan shows the entire 100-plus acre property, while the board just wants the plan to show the impacted area where trees were cut. Board members want to see the location of the fence O’Donnell agreed to put on her property as a condition of site plan approval.

O’Donnell said she cut the trees to clear space for a solar array on her property. Planning Board member Bob Gosselin said O’Donnell just keeps jumping the gun with her plans for the property.

“You do what you want to do, and then you put it on a plan and submit it to us,” he said. “That’s not the way you do it.”

Ruprecht said he’s exasperated the board hasn’t been able to move on with approval of her landscape plans with O’Donnell, a regular at board meeting since at least May. She had a May deadline to start work on the plants, berms and fence.

Source:  By Kathryn Gallerani | Wicked Local Kingston | Posted Nov 23, 2012 | www.wickedlocal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter