[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Government outlines possibilities for federal wind area  

Credit:  Sara Brown | Vineyard Gazette | November 20, 2012 | www.mvgazette.com ~~

Efforts continue to move forward on plans to develop a wind energy area in federal waters south of the Vineyard, with the Bureau of Ocean Management (BOEM) releasing an environmental assessment and identifying five different configurations for the area.

At a public hearing last week, bureau representatives said the preferred option would be to develop an 877 square nautical mile area about 12 nautical miles south of the Vineyard, though smaller configurations are also on the table to address concerns about North Atlantic right whales and impacts to cultural resources and view sheds.

After gathering public comment, BOEM will likely decide on a wind area early next year, program manager Maureen A. Bornholdt said.

They would then move on to the leasing phase, she said, which would allow further public comment. The wind energy area would be divided and leased to up to five lessees, who would then conduct their own studies and data collection with meteorological towers and buoys. Leases are valid for 20 years.

Environmental protection specialist Brian Krevor said that with standard operating conditions in place, there are no reasonably foreseeable, or negligible to minor, impacts from the proposed wind area.

Mr. Krevor said concerns ranging from marine mammals to commercial fishing and economic impacts were examined. He said that in the daytime, the widest portion of the meteorological tower would be visible from shore, but most could not be seen by the naked eye during the day. At night, he said, lighting markers at the top of the tower could be visible on a clear night.

He also outlined the five proposals. The first, and preferred, option would be to develop the entire area, though high-value fishing grounds and sea duck habitat was excluded from the area after pubic comment.

A second proposal of 644 square nautical miles would further restrict areas where North Atlantic right whales frequent or are expected to visit. According to the environmental assessment, the whales – which are protected under the Endangered Species act and are said to have a population between 350 and 400 – have been present in the area during migration and sometimes feed there.

Other options would push the wind area further back from the shore because of concerns about the visual impact, one starting 15 nautical miles away from inhabited Massachusetts shoreline and another 21 nautical miles. These options were included “because visible structures in offshore areas could adversely impact the viewshed from onshore historical and cultural resources,” the assessment said.

A final option would call for no action at all, and no wind energy leases granted.

Some of the 30 or so people at the Katharine Cornell Theatre gave comments on the proposals, including several people with Vineyard Power, a local energy cooperative that is interested in developing a wind farm in the area. Concerns included how the wind area would be developed once it is leased, how the power would be distributed, and impacts on the landscape.

“I am extremely concerned about what this wind farm will do to our area,” said Mark Snider, the owner of Winnetu Oceanside Resort in Katama. He said that with his resort looking out over South Beach, he was “extremely concerned about the proximity of wind turbines to the shore and impact with night lighting . . . I know this will have a dramatic visual effect as we can now see from our shore the lighted communication towers from Nantucket, which is a 20-mile distance.”

He said the towers would “completely and forever” change the landscape of the south shore of the Vineyard, and asked for consideration of the 21-nautical mile setback.

Jo-Ann Taylor, the coastal planner for the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, said that North Atlantic right whales do pass through the area, and that the “easiest and best way” to protect whales was “just to not go there.”

An intergovernmental task force was created to discuss the project, with appointees from each Vineyard town.

Erik Peckar with Vineyard Power said he and others had not been able to identify who was on the task force, and asked for further transparency.

Chilmark selectman Warren Doty argued for a benefit to the Island communities, and said that choosing lessees that will give back to the community in some way, like Vineyard Power, “is very important, I think, to everyone in this room.”

The comment period for the environmental assessment ends on Dec. 3.

Source:  Sara Brown | Vineyard Gazette | November 20, 2012 | www.mvgazette.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.