[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Theo slams Viking decision not to explore windfarm compensation 

Credit:  by Neil Riddell | The Shetland Times | November 16, 2012 | www.shetlandtimes.co.uk ~~

A trustee has accused Viking Energy of “brushing aside” the charitable trust’s request to examine setting up a property compensation fund for those living near planned wind turbines.

Theo Smith said he was “very disappointed” after Viking chairman Bill Manson wrote to trustees saying that, with no turbines likely to be erected before 2017, it would be premature to set up a compensation fund.

In his letter, Mr Manson said he had spoken to surveyors locally and nationally and found “widespread agreement” that it is “rarely possible to quantify objectively any effect of windfarms on prices realised”. That was even more difficult when a windfarm had yet to be built, he added.

Trustees had been annoyed at Viking’s previous dismissal of such a fund, and Mr Smith was joined by independent trustee and windfarm supporter Bobby Hunter in voicing displeasure during yesterday’s trust meeting at Islesburgh. Mr Hunter said Viking must not be allowed to get away with saying the impact on house prices was “not quanti­fiable”.

Mr Smith said: “Most of the folk in this room today would agree that if you get a structure of the size [Viking] is proposing to erect virtually overlooking your property, it is bound to have an effect on the value of that property.

“We, as an investor, need to get an assurance from Viking now that if, in the future, it’s found that this windfarm is going to affect property prices, they are willing to set up a compensation fund.”

However, councillor trustee Robert Henderson said that on a fact-finding mission on the west coast of Scotland, he had heard “no mention” from community councils about windfarms causing property prices to tumble. “We can’t go jump­ing and making decisions until we have evidence to back that up,” he said.

Trust vice-chairman Jonathan Wills agreed, saying there was “no attempt to brush anything aside” but evidence from chartered surveyors and local assessors would need to be collated. Chairman Drew Ratter said he “can’t imagine it not being kept under review”.

Mr Manson wrote that there was “no renewable industry precedent” for establishing such a compensation fund, but until the project gets near­er construction “circumstances will be kept under periodic consid­eration”.

Sustainable Shetland chairman Andrew Halcrow said the organ­isation was committed to securing compensation for folk who will have turbines towering over their properties. He pointed to Denmark, where the state has made “loss of value” payments to more than 500 people living close to windfarms.

Mr Halcrow also advised Mr Manson to consider “going cap-in-hand” to Viking’s partners SSE. The energy giant this week announced a 38 per cent rise in profits to nearly £400 million in the first half of this financial year – weeks after raising electricity prices by nine per cent.

The charitable trust has a 45 per cent stake in the 103-turbine Viking project. In June trustees agreed to invest a further £6.3 million towards taking the windfarm to the stage where construction is ready to begin.

Financial controller Jeff Goddard informed trustees yesterday that Viking has so far drawn down £1.8 million of that sum.

Meanwhile, Mr Ratter said NHS Shetland’s Dr Sarah Taylor had offered to meet trustees before the end of the year to discuss progress on a health impact study into the windfarm.

Source:  by Neil Riddell | The Shetland Times | November 16, 2012 | www.shetlandtimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky