LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

So far we have only seen tip of the turbine iceberg 

Credit:  The Southern Reporter | 16 November 2012 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk ~~

I applaud Scottish Borders Council for taking into account the views of a large number of Borders residents who think the area is at saturation point for wind farms (“Claims SBC pressurised on turbines”, Southern, November 8).

The council has put in place carefully thought-out planning guidance on wind farms, including a Landscape Character Assessment (which not all local authorities have done) to aid proper decision-making.

SBC’s current planning guidance was drawn up in consultation with the Scottish Government, as it must be, and it is fully supportive of wind farms, provided they are properly sited. Its commitment to this is clear from the number of wind farms and wind turbines already operating in the Borders, which is greater than almost any other area of Scotland. And about the same number again are in the planning process.

The Scottish Government’s target now is for Scotland to produce 100 per cent equivalent of our electricity use from renewables by 2020. But the Borders already produces from wind some nine times the amount of electricity required by the region’s households.

So far we have only seen the tip of the iceberg – 1,000 turbines are now operational or in the pipeline in the Borders alone – and many of these new turbines are more than twice the height of those on Soutra.

So it is clear that the Borders is being targeted for wind farm development because of its proximity to the Central Belt and indeed the north of England, and because of its undulating hills and relatively low population. Our planners are inundated with applications, and no doubt developers consider that sheer pressure of work may lead to difficulty in scrutinising applications properly.

We are the people who have to live with these wind farms, and politicians would be wise to take note that many voters in the Borders think the countryside – our biggest asset – is at saturation point.

Annie Rhodes

Lilliesleaf

Source:  The Southern Reporter | 16 November 2012 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky