[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine referendum rejected by voters  

Credit:  By Antonio Coleman | www.cadillacnews.com | 11/07/2012 ~~

SHERMAN TOWNSHIP— It was only a small margin of votes that left a revision to the wind turbine zoning referendum rejected by voters in Sherman Township.

Full results were not available as of press time early this morning, but according to Sherman Township Supervisor David Eggle, the referendum on the ballot had received 232 “yes” votes and 267 “no” votes.

Judge Scott-Hill Kennedy of the 49th Circuit Court ordered the referendum to appear on the ballot after ruling in favor of non-profit organization Save our Sherman in a suit filed in July against the Sherman Township board and the Sherman clerk.

The previous referendum regarding zoning standards for wind turbines first appeared in 2010. The second referendum, a revision to the initial zoning standards set new standards on noise restrictions and a setback distance of 2,250 feet.

Bethany Bolduc, Sherman Township Clerk, said it was wonderful seeing so many local residents exercise their right to vote.

“I have been working elections since 2010, and this is the highest turnout I’ve seen,” Bolduc said.

She said throughout the discussion regarding wind turbine zoning in Sherman Township, there had continued to be select groups of citizens on both sides of the issue.

“Both sides have rights, and we’ve worked very hard within our guidelines to be fair to both as best we could,” Bolduc said. “We’ve tried our best as a planning commission to protect the rights of everyone.”

Prior to casting their votes, some residents went into neighborhoods knocking on doors to explain the referendum on the ballot, Bolduc said.

She said a number of voters were misinformed in regards to the effect their vote would have on wind turbine zoning. Bolduc said the referendum was not an approval or disapproval for the placement of wind turbines in Sherman Township. She said the referendum was not a “straight up and down“ vote but would allow residents to decide on a preference of specific or general wind energy guidelines.

Eggle said now that the referendum has been rejected, Sherman Township must consider new development ideas.

“Now that the provision has been removed, the board has to see what our options are and consider what our next step should be,” Eggle said.

Source:  By Antonio Coleman | www.cadillacnews.com | 11/07/2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.