LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Voters reject creation of large development fund 

Credit:  By Mark Roper | KSFY | November 7, 2012 | www.ksfy.com ~~

Voters have rejected Referred Law 14.

The rejection of Referred Law 14 denies the establishment of a state fund to grant money to large construction projects.

KSFY News spoke with supporters on both sides of Referred Law 14 to get their reaction.

Opponents of the law are celebrating tonight.

They say the law would take millions away from the general fund for education and healthcare

But supporters are disappointed.

They say the law was a benefit to the economic development of the state.

Wind energy, power plants, power lines, along with laboratories and facilities for testing are some of the large scale construction projects which would benefit from the fund.

Supporters and opponents of the law disagree on the economic benefits of a large development fund.

Ben Nesselhuf, chair of the South Dakota Democratic Party said “it means south Dakotans have decided it’s more important to invest in our kids and our seniors instead of corporations. I think it’s a very good sign that South Dakotans know that the best economic development is to invest in our people.

David Owen, President of the South Dakota Chamber of Commerce, said “even the opponents said they believe in economic development. I don’t think we’re debating whether we do economic development, we’re debating how we best go about that.”

“After a period of reflection about what voters are actually saying, we need to sit down with a large group and either go back to refund policy of the past or do something to make sure south Dakota continues to be competitive for the largest investments as we compete with other states so they don’t steal our own industries. It was a great debate and a great conversation. We look forward to forming a very workable policy in the future,” Owen added.

Nesselhuf says he’s not surprised it looks like it won’t pass.

While Owen tells me the law was misunderstood.

He says it’s possible they didn’t get the message of the benefits of the law across to the voters.

Source:  By Mark Roper | KSFY | November 7, 2012 | www.ksfy.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky