[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Company blamed for wind farm death  

Credit:  By Rebecca Quilliam | The New Zealand Herald | Nov 2, 2012 | www.nzherald.co.nz ~~

A contractor working on a Wellington wind farm did not do enough to stop a machine from falling down a steep slope, killing one of its workers, a court was told today.

Transfield Services Ltd has been defending a charge this week at the Wellington District Court of failing to protect its workers after an employee died in June last year.

Filipino father of four, Edwin Sarmiento, 42, was killed and Antonio Maniago seriously injured when a machine fell as they were lifting them to do line maintenance at the Makara site.

The men worked for Electrix, which had been hired by Transfield, when the Manitou telescopic handler toppled down a steep gully, and the men fell about 20m.

The Manitou is mainly used in agriculture and is similar to a forklift, but has a crane boom that lifts into the air.

In closing statements in front of Judge Tom Broadmore today, Greg La Hood, appearing for the Government’s labour group, said the company should have used suspended ladders for the men to complete the work.

Transfield also needed to ensure the Manitou was being used by a trained operator.
It was also questioned whether the machine was being used properly.

“The machine was not specifically designed to carry personnel at an elevated level,” Mr La Hood said.

The company should also have obtained information on slope limits for the Manitou, he said.

“There were limits to this machine.”

The company was working on rough terrain on uneven ground in a “difficult, complex environment and more could have been done”, Mr La Hood said.

Adrian Olney, appearing for Transfield said there were lots of uncertainties around the facts of the case.

He said there had been almost “complete disregard” for what Transfield had done and too much focus on what steps they had not done.

He said the Government’s labour group had offered many steps Transfield should have taken in a “breezy” way, such as using ladders, but there were many health and safety issues around that suggestion, which made the step not that practical.

Transfield was known for its expertise in working in difficult conditions and its high health and safety standards.

“It works at great heights everyday in rough terrain,” Mr Olney said.

If convicted, Transfield could face a $250,000 fine.

Source:  By Rebecca Quilliam | The New Zealand Herald | Nov 2, 2012 | www.nzherald.co.nz

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch