[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Historian Oliver attacks ‘uglifying’ wind turbines  

Credit:  CATRIONA STEWART | The Herald | 29 October 2012 ~~

Television historian Neil Oliver has launched a blistering attack on the Scottish Government and its green energy plans.

Oliver, best known for presenting the BBC’s Coast series, spoke out against the increasing numbers of “intrusive and uglifying” wind farms, warning they could ruin every viewin Scotland.

The 45-year-old also accused Donald Trump, the American billionaire, of presiding over the “wholesale destruction” of an irreplaceable stretch of Scottish coastline.

In an outspoken critique of the future of Scotland’s landscapes, he went on to urge corporations and elected representatives to tell the truth and not hide behind spin.

He said: “I’ve got to the point where I wish politicians and big companies would just talk to the population like grown-ups. Wind turbines, whatever you think they look like, are destructive and intrusive.

“They involve massive amounts of cement, which is an extremely ungreen material, and pre-suppose the construction of power lines either with pylons or underground cables.”

The Stirling-based academic said the public needed to hear the unvarnished truth about the hard choices that lay ahead.

“We’ve become squeamish about oil and gas-powered power stations and we’re definitely squeamish about nuclear power. We should be grown-up enough to understand that if our energy is to come from turbines, it will come with a price.

“That price might be that in the future we live in a country that is in many ways uglified. If you want renewable power then you’ll have to live with a landscape that is completely altered by turbines so that every view on land and seascape will be compromised.”

Oliver accused Alex Salmond of ingratiating himself with the rich, and attacked Labour and the Tories for wanting to preserve the union for self-serving reasons.

The broadcaster, who also hosted A History of Scotland, claimed it was ironic and “almost the stuff of a Biblical parable” that Trump had raised fears that the siting of wind turbines in the North Seawould ruin the beauty of his Aberdeenshire golf complex.

Lawyers for Trump last week demanded a public inquiry into plans for a wind farm near his Balmedie course.

He added: “There’s an irony in the fact that Trump is upset about something which he feels will destroy the landscape. We’re too grown-up as a people, I hope, to be fooled by the idea that you can have the world’s most prestigious golf course, hundreds of holiday apartments and a fivestar hotel and therewon’t be any consequences from that.

“That dune system, which was almost unique in Scotland, has been scraped away by an army of bulldozers.”

On the referendum, the Renfrewshire-born historian said: “Independence is a powerful word and it begs the question: what are you independent of? On the one hand you say you want to be freed from Westminster, but there is always going to be someone out there you’ve got to get into bed with that compromises some of your ideals.

“You can argue that Salmond wants independence for the good of the people of Scotland, but it’s also for his professional advancement. Likewise, the unionist parties don’t want it because of all the well-rehearsed reasons.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Scotland has astounding green energy potential and vast natural resources and we have a responsibility to make sure our nation seizes this opportunity to create tens of thousands of jobs and secure billions of pounds of investment.”

Source:  CATRIONA STEWART | The Herald | 29 October 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.