[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Rejection calls over planed 99m turbines near Ulverston  

Credit:  North-West Evening Mail | 24 October 2012 | www.nwemail.co.uk ~~

Five giant wind turbines would be a blight on the Furness landscape, say council planning officers.

Plans to build the 99.5m (326ft) tall structures in Pennington are due to be discussed by South Lakeland District Council tomorrow, but look set to be rejected.

A report to planning committee members says the “intimidating” turbines would harm neighbours’ living conditions and cause the character of the area to be “completely lost”.

The turbines, with a 2.3MW power output, are almost twice as tall as five they would replace.

The application falls on council boundaries, meaning three of the turbines would be within the Barrow Borough Council area and the other two within South Lakeland.

However, a single application has been submitted to both authorities “due to viability”, meaning refusal from either council would likely put an end to any development.

The application is from energy firm Infinergy, which would own the three turbines in the Barrow borough.

The owner of the exiting turbines, Baywind Energy Cooperative, would retain the two turbines in South Lakeland.

While it is accepted that the development would improve renewable energy generation in the area, the impact on the surrounding area is deemed to outweigh the benefits, according to SLDC planning officials.

The five new turbines would provide energy for around 6,000 homes and offset between 11,000 and 26,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide each year.

But a visual impact report submitted to the council said the effect of installing the bigger turbines would be “significant”.

The report advises members: “The importance of protecting existing assets must be expressly weighed against the benefits that would result from the proposal.

“Given the severity of harm to individual properties, the fact that relatively few properties are affected is not significant.

“The proposal will make a tangible contribution to targets for renewable energy generation.

“However, the contribution to achieving regional and national targets for renewable energy generation does not outweigh the adverse visual impacts of the proposal, the harm to living conditions of local residents and the significant impacts on users of the adjacent public footpaths taken together.”

A decision from Barrow planners is pending.

A date for them to discuss the application has yet to be set.

Source:  North-West Evening Mail | 24 October 2012 | www.nwemail.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.