Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors; National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way.
Ratepayer money being blown on wind
Credit: Worcester Telegram & Gazette | October 24, 2012 | www.telegram.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Let’s rein in state tax and ratepayer subsidies of industrial wind projects.
Just looking at state data, the piece by Lisa Hagen and Joel Senick (“Mass. legislators push for renewal of expiring wind energy credits,” Sunday Telegram, Oct. 7) left out more than it supplied. Let’s be clear: The “state grants” come from a tax on all residential and commercial electricity ratepayers in Massachusetts. The Renewable Energy Trust accumulates approximately $25 million a year. Then a quasi-public agency gives this money to consultants and wind developers for wind feasibility and noise studies, and design and construction grants.
The MassCEC has given $26 million of ratepayer money to approximately 184 wind projects (based on data from the MassCEC, and its predecessor, the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative).
Contrary to what the authors stated, the Berkshire Wind Project did not go forward on its own. The Berkshire Wind Power Cooperative Corporation received a $149,900 grant from the ratepayer tax fund for this project. This “coop” is made up of the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company and 14 municipal light companies in Massachusetts. In addition, the MassCEC guaranteed the purchase of Renewable Energy Credits from the project. So if Berkshire Wind cannot sell its RECs on the open market, the Massachusetts ratepayers and taxpayers will pick up the tab. In addition, because Berkshire Wind is a cooperative, it used eminent domain to obtain a critical piece of privately owned land. The 10-turbine project produces 6/100th of 1 percent of Massachusetts’ total electricity demand.
VIRGINIA IRVINE
Brimfield
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |
Share: