[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Masquerade  

Credit:  Justine Cook | The Manchester Journal | 10/22/2012 | www.manchesterjournal.com ~~

Over 200 people descended on Montpelier on October 12th to protest industrial-scale wind turbines on Vermont’s ridgelines by awarding Governor Shumlin, the Public Service Board, and the Department of Public Service a “Certificate of Public Harm.” Governor Shumlin reappointed PSB Chairman James Volz to the 3-person board, and he has made it clear that he wants wind turbines up “as fast as we can build them.” In Shumlin’s narrative, global climate change is upon us and Vermont can slow it down by building industrial-scale wind projects to power electric cars that will be charged at night when the wind blows. In this new electrical future when we’re off fossil fuels and nuclear power, he’ll still bring Broadband to “every last mile” and Smart meters will manage the massively expanded grid.

Is this a realistic vision or a dystopian nightmare in which heavily subsidized “green” companies profit from building projects and rolling out technologies that ultimately contribute nothing to reducing global warming and leave generations of Vermonters in debt?

In a revealing exchange on Mark Johnson’s July 17th radio show, Governor Shumlin answers this question. He said: “I say, as this Governor, that putting 440 foot wind towers up on into the sky will probably not be the energy technology in terms of renewables 40 years from now. I just think it will be seen as antiquated, frankly. There are going to be smaller wind projects, probably, you know, mounted to our houses and other lower buildings, and we are able to take down the old technology, let the trees grow, and you know, our kids won’t have the extraordinary problem we have with an aging nuclear plant ”

Apparently, blasting a mountain range flat, as happened with the Lowell mountains in the Northeast Kingdom with 700,000 pounds of explosives, putting an interstate across the top, and siting turbines on acres of concrete is akin to switching technologies from, say, VHS apes to DVDs, because “the trees will grow.” But flattening mountains is a choice Vermonters will make forever.

This disregard for facts marks much of Shumlin’s vision. The fact is that physicists cannot even agree on the efficacy of wind power because the intermittent electricity it generates cannot be easily integrated or stored, and must be backed up with a conventional power plant. For many experts, this unsolved conundrum means that building and installing industrial-scale wind projects generates more carbon emissions than will ever be reduced in a lifetime of production, thereby making them an implausible solution for combating global warming.

As for the electric cars the Governor wishes us to buy, according to a recent CBS news story, current battery technology cannot effectively power electric cars while struggling to heat them in a cold climate. That would be Vermont.

With Broadband, Shumlin invokes the old image of electricity being brought to “every last mile” with poles and wire, but on his watch Broadband will not be primarily transmitted via costly, but safer, fiber optic cable. It will be transmitted by extremely powerful cell phone networks that are also being put on the ridgelines – an estimated 160 to date. In light of his purported concern for global warming, one needs to ask where the electricity is coming from?

According to a recent New York Times story, the global Internet is powered by an equivalent of 30 nuclear power plants. Wind and solar energy simply cannot power Governor Shumlin’s Broadband/Smart grid dream for Vermont. The truth is his vision comes with an enormous environmental cost, health and security concerns, as well as with an erosion of property rights that has already begun with utilities exercising eminent domain for new cell towers and expanded transmission capacity. Whatever one’s feelings about blanketing the state in electric radiation and flattening the ridgelines for the illusory promises of industrial-scale wind power, Vermonters need to ask hard questions of our five official candidates for governor, and one write-in candidate Annette Smith who is a committed environmentalist and famously anti-industrial wind. The future will not magically repair itself with new technology as Governor Shumlin believes, and we need to make sound choices now to protect the planet, not indulge in a masquerade.

Justine Cook lives in Dorset

Source:  Justine Cook | The Manchester Journal | 10/22/2012 | www.manchesterjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter