[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Councils don’t know how much they’re spending on windfarm applications 

Credit:  Scottish Conservatives | 18 October 2012 | www.scottishconservatives.com ~~

The majority of councils across Scotland have no idea how much they are spending on processing windfarm applications as firms inundate them with planning applications.

Only nine local authorities were able to give any kind of indication about how much was spent dealing with submissions, and only two were able to work out an overall cost – totalling nearly £750,000.

Most said that the vast number of windfarm applications coming into the planning system was making it difficult to calculate the overall cost, and given windfarm applications were part the general planning process, no exact cost could be given in many instances.

As a result, the Scottish Conservatives have called for the Scottish Government to calculate the sheer cost burden of such applications on councils.

Three local authorities this year asked for a moratorium on windfarm applications, such was the financial and resource burden of such large-scale applications.

But this has been rejected by the SNP, which instead wants to encourage even more bids to suit its renewable energy policy.

The revelation comes as anti-windfarm protestors prepare to march in Perth on Saturday to coincide with the SNP conference.

City authorities like Glasgow and Edinburgh received no windfarm bids, due to their urban setting, but Scottish Borders said £227,000 had been spent working on applications since 2007, while in Orkney that cost was nearly £500,000.

Four other councils spent tens of thousands on consultant and legal fees, meaning the total spend of only six relatively small authorities was around £800,000 over five years.

And with two authorities failing to respond, that suggests the total cost across Scotland could run into several millions of pounds.

Scottish Conservative Mid Scotland and Fife MSP Liz Smith said:

“We know councils all over Scotland are really struggling to cope with the sheer burden large-scale windfarm applications bring, particularly if there are several of them.

“But it is extremely worrying that so many of these local authorities are unable to outline to overall financial cost of this, especially when at least three have called for a moratorium.

“And if we look at those who have been able to quantify costs, the suggestion has to be that this cost must run into several millions.

“It is nothing for a major energy firm to throw in speculative applications for completely inappropriate windfarms, but councils then have to pour in all kinds of resources to resolve it, even if it’s a completely unrealistic submission.

“Council tax payers should not have to foot the bill for the SNP’s obsession with windfarms.

“It is bad enough that the views of communities are ignored when council rejections of windfarms are overturned in Holyrood.

“We now need the Scottish Government and local authorities to work together to estimate some kind of cost to all this.

“That would allow an informed decision on moratoriums to be made, meaning hard-pressed council resources could be better used.”

The following councils were able to detail a total cost of windfarm applications since 2007:

Orkney – £488,886

Scottish Borders – £226,990

The following councils spent the following on legal and consultant fees since 2007:

Clackmannanshire – £2350

Midlothian – £56,158

North Ayrshire – £13,767

South Lanarkshire – £10,085

Overall known total – £798,236

City authorities like Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen did not receive applications for windfarms in that timeframe.

The following councils were unable to produce a figure:



Argyll and Bute

Dumfries and Galloway


East Ayrshire

East Dunbartonshire

East Lothian

East Renfrewshire





North Lanarkshire

Perth and Kinross


South Ayrshire


West Dunbartonshire

West Lothian

Western Isles

Both Fife and Shetland failed to respond.

Source:  Scottish Conservatives | 18 October 2012 | www.scottishconservatives.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky