[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Minister is ‘in denial’ over anger at turbines 

Credit:  The Galloway Gazette | 15 October 2012 | www.gallowaygazette.co.uk ~~

Galloway MP Russell Brown has accused the Scottish govern-
ment of being “in denial” about problems with the number of windfarms in this area after handing over a petition signed by 2000 objectors to the Energy Minister.

The Labour MP said he was “deeply disappointed and frustrated” after a meeting with Holyrood Energy Minister Fergus Ewing on Wednesday. During the meeting Mr Ewing insisted he did not consider the number of turbines in Dumfries and Galloway was a problem, despite around 1000 turbines being in the planning or scoping stage.

During the past six weeks 2000 local people expressed frustration at the Scottish gov­ernment’s recent decisions to 
approve two windfarm devel­opments that had been rejected by Dumfries and Galloway Council – one at Carscreugh Fell near Glenluce in March and Glenchamber at the end of July. Mr Brown says the Scottish government’s decision to ignore 
local people is making it harder for supporters of wind energy.

The MP added: “With 2000 signatures, my petition clearly has the Scottish government rattled. During our meeting I left the minister in no doubt about the scale of the concern in Dumfries and Galloway about the number of wind turbines in our area. However, I was deeply disappointed and frustrated that the minister is in denial and still does not accept there is a problem. Once again the SNP believes it knows best and local people in Dumfries and Galloway are simply ignored.

“Instead of belittling the views of local people, the mini­ster needs to understand that by forcing more wind turbines on our region the SNP is turning 
previous supporters of wind energy against it. He couldn’t explain why the government overturned decisions by the council to reject applications for windfarms like Glenchamber, where both local council officers and councillors said it shouldn’t go ahead because of the adverse impact on our landscape. Instead he tried to pass the buck and say he wasn’t to blame. As the Scottish Energy Minister, he has to take responsibility for the govern­ment’s policies and the affect they are having on our area.

“The minister promised to con­sider the petition and I will follow it up. Local people have spoken loud and clear. I am going to fight tooth and nail to make sure the SNP government doesn’t brush our concerns under the carpet as always.”

A Scottish government spokesperson said: “The record shows that across the country planning authorities continue to support the vast majority of Scottish government deci­sions on major windfarms. When 
developers choose to appeal deci­sions taken by planning authorities on smaller develop­ments, in the great majority (around two-thirds) of cases the 
decisions of planning author­ities have been upheld by the 
independent reporter appointed by Scottish Ministers.

“The Scottish Parliament recently backed the govern­ment’s renewable energy ambi­tions. Renewable energy is creating opportunities for communities across Scotland. The sector has already delivered 11,000 Scottish jobs, with many more in the pipeline. Grid improvements will create many more jobs and opportunities, including in southern Scotland.”

Meanwhile, people in the Car-
sphairn area are being invited to two exhibitions of proposals for a 36-turbine windfarm on a site due east of the village.

Source:  The Galloway Gazette | 15 October 2012 | www.gallowaygazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky