LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Penmanshiel wind farm appeal lodged 

Credit:  BBC News | www.bbc.co.uk 1 October 2012 ~~

A council has said it will “vigorously defend” an appeal by developers behind plans for a wind farm in Berwickshire.

RES UK has made the move because it claims Scottish Borders Council has not dealt with its 15-turbine Penmanshiel proposals within required timescales.

The company claimed the development had been “sensitively designed” to minimise its visual impact.

A spokesman for SBC said it was “disappointing” the firm had decided to proceed to the appeal stage.

RES Development Project Manager Ruth Elder said the project had been in planning for nearly a year without a decision being made.

She said “all the information required” had been made available to the council.

“We have taken the decision to appeal on the grounds of non-determination so the project has the potential to proceed without further unnecessary delay and contribute to Scotland’s ambitious renewable energy targets if consented,” she said.

“RES believes that Penmanshiel Moor is an ideal location for a wind farm.

“The wind farm has been sensitively designed to minimise views, particularly from the A1 corridor and from local settlements.”

‘Significant concerns’

However, a council spokesman said the company had not responded to requests to adjust its plans.

“The council wrote to the developers in June indicating that we could not support the application in its current form,” he said.

“This was because the turbines, at a height of 100m, would be over-dominant in the landscape and due to significant concerns about cumulative visual impact with other developments in the planning process but particularly with the constructed site at Drone Hill.

“In that letter we offered them the opportunity to modify the scheme and latterly we wrote asking to extend the time period to determine the application.

“However, we received no response to these requests.”

Source:  BBC News | www.bbc.co.uk 1 October 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky