| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
In Newark, industrial wind critics welcome Shumlin’s support
Credit: John Dillon | Vermont Public Radio | 09/28/12 | www.vpr.net ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Critics of a proposed wind development there say they’re pleased that the Shumlin Administration has taken notice of their opposition.
Governor Peter Shumlin is on record as saying he won’t support a wind development if a town votes against it.
That’s what happened recently in Newark, when voters overwhelmingly approved changes to the town plan to ban ridgeline wind projects.
Elizabeth Miller is commissioner of the Department of Public Service, the state agency that represents ratepayers. Her department plans to tell the Public Service Board on Monday that the local opposition is significant.
“Under the board’s precedent town plans do matter,” Miller says. “The board has to give them due consideration. And while they aren’t the only factor the board looks at, when the town plan is clear that a town does not want to see a certain type of development within in its borders, that – under the orderly development standard the board looks at – really does matter. And it matters to the department as the public advocate.”
Eolian Renewable Energy of Portsmouth, N.H. wants to build 35 turbines on ridgelines in remote Caledonia and Essex County. It calls the project Seneca Mountain Wind
Newark resident Noreen Hession has organized opposition. She’s cheered that the Shumlin Administration will tell the board about the changes to the town plan.
“This is yet another strike against Seneca Mountain Wind and Eolian, another message to tell them we do not want them in our town,” she says. “We do not want them to industrialize our town.”
Eolian officials have said they’re not yet pursuing a full scale project. At this stage, they’re asking the Public Service Board to approve construction of a wind measurement tower in Newark.
But Hession says the Newark town plan prohibits towers above 125 feet, so it applies to the smaller project as well.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=28552 ]
