| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Dennis remains involved in ARC lawsuit
Credit: By Nicole Muller | Wicked Local Cape Cod | www.wickedlocal.com 26 September 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
SOUTH DENNIS – As the Jan. 17 trial date in the Aquacultural Research Corporation vs. Old King’s Highway Regional Historic District Commission lawsuit approaches, Dennis selectmen say they intend to keep the town involved.
Following an executive session Tuesday night, Selectmen Chairman Paul McCormick said he cannot discuss his board’s litigation strategy in an ongoing case. Instead, McCormick said, selectmen wished to inform the public of their reasons for staying involved in the suit.
In August 2010, Dennis’ OKH Committee approved ARC’s application to construct a 600 kilowatt wind turbine on its property at 99 Chapin Beach Road in Dennis. Resident Rosemarie Austin, who considers herself a “visual abutter,” appealed that decision to the regional commission, which overturned the local determination. Since 2011, ARC has been fighting that action in court.
Selectmen have consistently stressed that they are not funding ARC’s appeal. “ARC has had its own counsel from the outset and has shouldered the responsibility of prosecuting this appeal,” McCormick said. “From the board’s perspective, however, this case presents significant questions involving the proper interpretation and application of the OKHRHD Act, such as the appropriate scope of review by the [regional historic district commission] of actions by the town’s historic district committee, and importantly, who may properly appeal a decision of the local historic committee to the regional commission.”
Acting through the town’s lawyer following Orleans District Court Judge Brian Merrick’s decision to allow Dennis to intervene as an interested party, McCormick said selectmen have not advocated on the merits of ARC’s proposal, “as it is ARC’s responsibility to persuade a judge that the regional commission ought not to have overturned the Dennis OKH Committee’s decision. Instead, we have focused on the broader issues identified above and economic issues affecting our town, which [we] feel are of sufficient concern to warrant the town’s continued participation in this case.”
McCormick noted Yarmouth’s failed attempt to intervene in support of the regional district commission and Austin.
“While Yarmouth was not ultimately permitted to intervene, its efforts to do so demonstrate that this case raises questions of importance to communities that make up the regional historic district beyond whether or not ARC should be able to erect a wind turbine on its property,” McCormick concluded.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=28373 ]
