News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Lawsuit demands Lowell revote on non-binding article  

Credit:  Reposted from Caledonian Record via Energize Vermont 25 September 2012 ~~

NEWPORT CITY – A Lowell resident wants a judge to force the Lowell Select Board to call a special town meeting to reconsider an article opposing the Lowell wind project.

The non-binding article, which begins “Shall the voters of of the Town of Lowell express their opposition to the GMP and VELCO wind project …,” was passed over by voice vote at the Lowell town meeting in March.

The select board in April, when presented with a petition to put the article back before voters at a special meeting, refused to do so. They said, according to the minutes, that they didn’t have to hold a special meeting because both the Vermont League of Cities and Towns and the secretary of state said that the article had not been voted on and no action had been taken so a special meeting wasn’t required.

An attorney for Edward Weselow, one of the proponents of the article, filed a complaint in Orleans Superior Court – Civil Division saying Weselow wants the superior court judge to order the select board to warn a special meeting on the article.

Weselow is also asking for any other relief that the court deems proper.

The select board, through the board’s attorney, responded in August that the article was not voted on but was passed over by voters. That means, attorney Richard Saudek said, that the board does not have to put it back on a special meeting ballot to have voters reconsider it.

The board wants the lawsuit dismissed and the town compensated for the cost of defending against the lawsuit.

The article was one of several non-binding referendums before Lowell voters at town meeting about the Lowell wind project and renewable energy.

Selectmen said later that they found out after they put the articles on the ballot that they did not have to put such petitioned but non-binding articles before the voters.

The anti-wind article from Weselow and other wind opponents states, in part, that:

“Shall the voters of the Town of Lowell express their opposition to the GMP and VELCO wind project, given that these companies have violated the rights of private property owners, destroyed federally protected stream headwaters, destroyed the ridgeline, will cause clinical depression and/or stress for many of those that live around it …”

The article was one of three different non-binding articles about the wind project and renewable energy on the Lowell town meeting ballot, which were considered on the floor last March.

An article supporting the contract that Lowell has with GMP over taxes for the wind project and telling opponents that they were causing delays in the project also was considered. An effort to pass over that failed. It was approved by a vote of 64 to 55.

Also on the town meeting ballot, Weselow asked voters to create a non-profit company called Vermont Free Power to help Vermonters buy green renewable resource solar panels and micro wind mills.

Voters passed over that article as well.

Source:  Reposted from Caledonian Record via Energize Vermont 25 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.