[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Kicks in both kneecaps 

Credit:  Yorkshire Post | 22 September 2012 ~~

In his letter “Positive spin on turbines” ( Yorkshire Post September 7), Eric Daines draws attention to the electricity generating stations Ferrybridge C, Eggborough and Drax and their impact on the visual environment. Here is a comparison of those three “real monstrosities” and his apparent preference for windmills.

They have an annual output of about 46TW/hr and it is available on demand, at the flick of a switch. A single wind farm, on land (one has to be equitable), which would produce the same quantity of electricity per year would need 5,600 windmills, each of 3-5 MW capacity. They would be 150m (490ft) high to the blade tip. The cooling towers at Drax are 115m (377ft) high. Such a single “farm” would cover an area of 430 square miles. Put into perspective, this would be equal to the area of Yorkshire bounded by the M62 to the south, the A1 to the west and, from the north to the east, the boundary would be from the A1/A59 (through York), A1079 (to Market Weighton) and A1034 to the M62. Not a practical proposition but a comparison nevertheless. There are kicks in both kneecaps: the output of the wind farm is not available on demand but only when the wind is blowing sufficiently and there seems to be nearly as much objection to putting them offshore as there is onshore.

DM Loxley, Hartoft, Pickering.

Source:  Yorkshire Post | 22 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky