| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Celia Hobbs: The community benefit of wind farms is still up in the air
Credit: Celia Hobbs | www.scotsman.com 18 September 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
In the future, historians will puzzle how landscapes, revered for generations, were destroyed by 100-metre-plus machines all over the country.
Perhaps it is because humans have a survival instinct which means it is safer to act en masse. It is dangerous to be out on a limb, jeopardising jobs and friends. Public relations for the wind industry has been magnificent in persuading conformists it is all right to erect machines in once valued landscapes.
There have been areas where the normal reaction for landscape preservation has prevailed. For example, the Auchencorth wind farm proposal had 27 representations for and 2,400 against. The proposal was defeated. The same landowner is proposing a wind farm under three miles away at Mount Lothian. It is a mystery to us, who backed up Midlothian Council at the Auchencorth public inquiry, how the developer expects to get this new one through.
It now seems clearer. Are they hoping to use public relations? There has been a recent phone poll in the area with yes/no answers around the wind farm. One asks if communities benefit from wind farms. As communities have received “community benefit”, a quick response would be yes. But think how that could be used. If locals read, say, 90 per cent of residents closest to the turbines think their community will benefit from the wind farm, others further away might think they have no right to object. Result!
The reality is that millions of pounds, which the wind industry should have paid in compensation to individual property owners, has been reduced to paltry sums paid out to communities. Tim Yeo says communities should be bribed to accept wind farms. I believe the landscape belongs to all and shouldn’t be traded.
Another triumph for the PR industry was claiming it was a myth that wind farms reduce property prices. Now a couple have won reduced council tax due to the blight on their property from a wind farm. It is common sense that properties would be less valuable with a machine the height of St Paul’s Cathedral whirling nearby than a property in open countryside. The moral is: think for yourself.
• Celia Hobbs is a member of Penicuik Environment Protection Association.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=28104 ]
