News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Landowners can speak ill of wind company  

Credit:  www.saukvalley.com 22 August 2012 ~~

Wind energy companies’ contracts with landowners include confidentiality clauses, which may not be as extensive as some may believe.

Recently, I obtained two early versions of proposed contracts by Mainstream Renewable Power, which is planning a wind farm in Lee, Whiteside and Bureau counties.

Last year, a wind farm opponent suggested the confidentiality clauses barred landowners from discussing health problems that they believe resulted from nearby wind turbines.

That allegation was made during a meeting of the Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals, which was considering changes to the county’s wind energy ordinance.

Asked during the meeting about the opponent’s claim, John Martin of Mainstream declined to comment, saying confidentiality clauses themselves were “inherently confidential.”

Audience members snickered.

Another Mainstream representative, Keith Bolin, said no one would be barred from talking about their health. He said he was offended at the insinuation they couldn’t.

Bolin was correct, as the early versions of the contract show.

In one version, the confidentiality clause reads, “The landowner agrees that all confidential information received by the landowner relating to the wind power project or developer is the property of the developer and shall be kept absolutely secret, undisclosed, in trust and in confidence…”

What does this include?

The terms of the contract and Mainstream’s business activities, client lists, technical specifications, among other things.

I could find nothing in either version of the contract that stops people from blaming turbines for poor health. In fact, no provision bars landowners with turbines from speaking ill of Mainstream or its project.

If the terms of the lease are confidential, how did we get copies? A landowner initially interested in having turbines soured on the idea. This landowner never signed the agreement, so wasn’t bound by its terms. This kind person gave it to us.

That’s how we could make the “inherently confidential” confidentiality clause completely public.

[NWW note:  Click here to see sample contracts on file at National Wind Watch. Most of them specify that the entire contract is confidential. In practice, noise complaints require operation information that the company deems to be confidential. A lease from Atlantic Wind specifies confidential information only, but explicitly waives the lessor’s right to complain about any noise, visual, and flicker nuisance.]

Source:  www.saukvalley.com 22 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.