LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Inquiry boss makes noise over wind farm infrasound 

Credit:  ABC News | www.abc.net.au 22 August 2012 ~~

The chairman of a South Australian parliamentary inquiry into wind farms wants guidelines in place for the low-frequency sound emitted by wind farms.

Opposition planning spokesman David Ridgway says the National Health and Medical Research Council is investigating the effects of infrasound on people.

He says standard Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) guidelines are in place to ensure sound levels from developments are not too loud.

However, he says it is the frequency, not the volume of sound from wind farms, that needs assessing.

“I’ve often described that infrasound as being a little like car sickness – there’s four people in a car, one feels sick and the other three feel fine,” he said.

“So I suspect infrasound is something a little like that, which will be difficult to get guidelines but the EPA are looking forward to that research.”

Mr Ridgway is also calling for the minimum distance between wind farms and houses to be extended.

Under interim government planning rules, turbines have to be at least one kilometre from isolated dwellings.

Mr Ridgway says that distance is much shorter than in other states.

He says new projects are being assessed on the interim rules while research and reviews on issues like buffer zones are still taking place.

“In the interim development plan amendment, in respect of whatever it’s amending, those rules apply while it’s in interim operation,” he said.

“So even if the rules are changed and the distances are extended, we would’ve had a 12-month period where we’ve had very different rules previously, we may have a 12-month period where we have very different rules going forward.”

Source:  ABC News | www.abc.net.au 22 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky