[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Inquiry boss makes noise over wind farm infrasound  

Credit:  ABC News | www.abc.net.au 22 August 2012 ~~

The chairman of a South Australian parliamentary inquiry into wind farms wants guidelines in place for the low-frequency sound emitted by wind farms.

Opposition planning spokesman David Ridgway says the National Health and Medical Research Council is investigating the effects of infrasound on people.

He says standard Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) guidelines are in place to ensure sound levels from developments are not too loud.

However, he says it is the frequency, not the volume of sound from wind farms, that needs assessing.

“I’ve often described that infrasound as being a little like car sickness – there’s four people in a car, one feels sick and the other three feel fine,” he said.

“So I suspect infrasound is something a little like that, which will be difficult to get guidelines but the EPA are looking forward to that research.”

Mr Ridgway is also calling for the minimum distance between wind farms and houses to be extended.

Under interim government planning rules, turbines have to be at least one kilometre from isolated dwellings.

Mr Ridgway says that distance is much shorter than in other states.

He says new projects are being assessed on the interim rules while research and reviews on issues like buffer zones are still taking place.

“In the interim development plan amendment, in respect of whatever it’s amending, those rules apply while it’s in interim operation,” he said.

“So even if the rules are changed and the distances are extended, we would’ve had a 12-month period where we’ve had very different rules previously, we may have a 12-month period where we have very different rules going forward.”

Source:  ABC News | www.abc.net.au 22 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter