[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Good energy sense 

Credit:  By Boston Herald Editorial Staff | www.bostonherald.com 19 August 2012 ~~

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney proved himself a long missing voice of reason recently with his promise to end a renewable energy subsidy. It’s a welcome contrast to the economic fairy dust President Barack Obama is spreading these days.

Romney told the Des Moines Register that, if elected, he would let the Production Tax Credit for electricity generated from renewable sources expire, so as to “create a level playing field” for energy sources. (A Senate committee has voted to renew the credit.) A campaign spokesman later said Romney remained a “strong supporter” of wind power.

In the battleground state of Iowa, where many farmers lease land to windmill operators, Obama mocked Romney’s earlier remark that “You can’t drive a car with a windmill on top.”

Said Obama, “I know he’s had other things on his car” – a too-cute dig at Romney’s famous trip with the family pooch on top. Still, Romney is correct: Wind does nothing for transportation fuels.

Obama asserted that wind power supports 7,000 Iowa jobs and 73,000 nationwide.

Iowa, like Massachusetts and 28 other states, requires utilities to get a certain percentage of their power from renewable sources (usually at above-market prices). Jobs supported by legal coercion and public subsidies are nothing to brag about.

How many jobs would be supported by use of efficient natural gas turbines instead of windmills? How many jobs would be generated by the federal subsidy if that money went elsewhere? We weren’t told that. (The subsidy, a tax credit of 2.2 cents per kilowatt-hour produced, could amount to $192,000 for every day the Cape Wind project, for example, delivers full contracted electricity to NStar [NST] and National Grid.)

Obama criticized subsidies to the oil industry, said to be $4 billion a year. Let’s abolish any true subsidies there too. Level playing fields are always best.

Our country faces budget deficits as far as the eye can see and will never control them until politicians show self-discipline in doing favors that benefit any one generator of energy or another.

Source:  By Boston Herald Editorial Staff | www.bostonherald.com 19 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky