[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

TRUenergy to challenge wind farm snub 

Credit:  ABC News | www.abc.net.au 14 August 2012 ~~

Electricity company TRUenergy will appeal against the Goyder council’s decision to reject its Stony Gap wind farm proposal in mid-north South Australia.

The council’s development assessment panel rejected TRUenergy’s proposal on August 1.

It was the first time a wind farm application had been knocked back at council level, under new State Government reforms.

The panel voted three-two against the development over health concerns relating to noise.

TRUenergy says the application met all state planning requirements and was supported by the council’s independent planning consultant, who recommended the application be approved.

It says it will appeal against the ruling in the Environment, Resources and Development Court.

TRUenergy says the 41-turbine wind farm would create more than 80 construction jobs and likely inject more than $15 million into the economy.

The company has also lodged an application to add six turbines to its Waterloo wind farm, near Clare, with the Clare and Gilbert Valleys Council.

Senator Nick Xenophon says he is not surprised TRUenergy has appealed against the Goyder council’s rejection of the wind farm.

“This is not unexpected, there is a lot of money at stake here,” he said.

“The developer has a massive commercial interest in this development and I believe this case will be a test case in relation to wind energy in the context of how close it can be located to residents and their homes.”

Senator Xenophon says the court will need to consider all evidence from both sides when assessing the appeal.

“It’ll need to hear scientific evidence both in terms of low-frequency noise, the potential health impacts and I think it’s important that there be a case where as much evidence is heard, both for and against, so the court can make up its mind based on all the available evidence,” he said.

Source:  ABC News | www.abc.net.au 14 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky