News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Sussex surfers say wind farms will wreck their waves  

Credit:  The Argus | www.theargus.co.uk 8 August 2012 ~~

Surfers are protesting against a proposed giant wind farm off the Sussex coast because they believe it will seriously affect their waves.

Surfers Against Sewage (SAS) say the plans for the offshore Rampion farm, which will stretch from Newhaven to Worthing, will reduce the height of the surf by 22%.

Energy company E.ON is planning to construct up to 195 turbines, which it says will generate enough electricity to supply the equivalent of 450,000 homes.

SAS director Hugh Tagholm said waves and surfing beaches should be recognised and protected as an important part of the UK coastal heritage.

He said: “We are not against the concept of sustainable green energy like this and we support it.

“However, we do have an issue about the potential loss of 22% of the surfing wave height at Brighton Marina and surf spots to the east of the city.

“These are some of the country’s most popular and well established surfing beaches.

“This potential reduction would be an unacceptable level to SAS and the local surfing community.

“The surf needs to be conserved and protected and we hope the developers will be able to come up with a solution that can help mitigate this potential loss. We are looking forward to meeting with the developers to address our concerns.”

The SAS is now calling on people to sign its national petition to fight against projects it believes could threaten surf conditions.

Meanwhile the South Downs Society has highlighted its concerns about E.ON’s plans to run eight miles of underground power cables across the South Downs National Park and the visual impact the wind turbines will have.

Chairman Robert Cheesman said E.ON would have to do a lot more work to reassure the community.

He said: “We support efforts to generate energy from renewable, “green” sources but we look at each case on its merits.

“Looking out from the Brighton seafront is one thing, the view from Beachy Head is quite another.

“We’re pleased that E.ON has opted for underground cables rather than overhead wires but we have yet to see a proper justification for the route they favour.”

The company is consulting with the public ahead of submitting a planning application.

A spokeswoman for E.ON said: “In the draft environmental statement for a project, we’re required to outline the worst case scenario in terms of the number and scale of turbines and foundations.

“However, the precise design and layout is yet to be determined.

“In this case the potential for a small reduction in wave height in this worst case of the largest number of wind turbines possible at the site with the largest and heaviest type of foundations (gravity base foundations).

“It is unlikely that this type of foundation would be used for all 195 turbines for the Rampion wind farm. In fact, monopile foundations and jacket foundations are the most typical in the UK and these designs have negligible impact on wave heights.

“We’ve already been in touch with Surfers Against Sewage and will be meeting with them in August to discuss in detail any concerns they have.”

Source:  The Argus | www.theargus.co.uk 8 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.