[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

AM calls for wind turbine rules review  

Credit:  Western Telegraph | www.westerntelegraph.co.uk 21 July 2012 ~~

A call for a review of wind turbine planning laws in Wales is being made by Pembrokeshire AM Angela Burns.

The Welsh Assembly was recently petitioned requesting noise from wind turbines to be controlled, but the government rejected three of the four recommendations made.

Mrs Burns took issue with the government’s response and referred to a report in the British Medical Journal which said there was real evidence of a strong link between wind turbine noise, ill health and disruption of sleep.

She said later: “Poor legislation and law will never serve us well, and I believe that the general consensus is that the current Welsh laws around planning for wind power are not fit for purpose, are too subjective and leave a bad taste in most people’s mouths.

“I am not saying that wind turbines are wrong, but the Welsh Government needs to evaluate and satisfy, beyond reproach, all criteria for planning to ensure that people are not blighted with illhealth and loss of amenity, and there is complete continuity in the decisions made, whether you are in Pembroke or Pencader.”

Planning permission was recently granted to Princes Gate Spring Water for two turbines in Ludchurch, which would be the tallest in the county.

As the Western Telegraph reported last week, concern has been voiced that the health and safety impact on the nearby Belle Vue Equestrian Centre was not correctly emphasised at the planning meeting.

And Mary Sinclair, the chairman of the Pembrokeshire branch of the CPRW (Council for the Protection of Rural Wales), has since said that a report quoted in a response from the company about ‘negligible impacts on agricultural activities and livestock’ was ‘incorrect and misleading’.

Source:  Western Telegraph | www.westerntelegraph.co.uk 21 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.