[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Former Maine official defrauded ratepayers, FERC staff says  

Credit:  By Nick Sambides Jr., BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | bangordailynews.com 19 July 2012 ~~

A Portland company that advised the Lincoln and Rumford paper mills on their participation in an electricity program five years ago faces $8.7 million of the $26.4 million in fines federal regulators are seeking for the alleged defrauding of New England ratepayers, federal documents revealed Thursday.

Staff at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission allege that Richard Silkman of Competitive Energy Services LLC, former head of the Maine State Planning Office, fraudulently manipulated the energy market and should pay $1.2 million in civil penalties, according to notices filed at the FERC website.

The commission voted 5-0 on Tuesday to follow staff recommendations and file notices of the proposed penalties to Silkman and the three companies, said FERC spokesman Craig Cano. CES faces an additional $7.5 million in fines and Rumford Paper Co. $13.25 million in fines should FERC win its pending case, Cano said Thursday.

CES strongly denied the allegations. Company officials said in a statement released Thursday that FERC’s accusations emanate from a program that FERC itself found “fatally flawed” and later terminated. CES said it repeatedly explained the advice it gave the paper mills to the ISO New England managers of the electricity program, which paid large-scale energy producers to reduce their electricity use during times of high demand, and those managers never indicated finding any fault with the advice.

“We advised our clients regarding this complex program as instructed to by the program guidelines and in the same manner as dozens of other participants,” Competitive Energy Services said in the statement. “Our customers did nothing different from scores of other New England entities who participated in the [ISO New England] demand response program, only two of whom are being investigated.

“This issue has not been reviewed in any fair or reasonable setting – the FERC review was a closed and non-transparent process that we were prohibited from even discussing,” the statement continued. “Until yesterday, FERC never responded at all to any of the significant amount of evidence and explanations we submitted to them, and even now, they don’t address important evidence that contradicts their conclusion that we did anything wrong.”

The commission will await the exchange of responses from the defendants and staff over the next 60 days before making a ruling that, if appealed, could push the dispute into the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., Cano said.

FERC announced Wednesday that it is seeking $4.4 million i n civil penalties from Lincoln Paper & Tissue LLC. According to FERC’s allegations, Silkman and CES advised the companies to set what staff called “artificially inflated” baseline consumption rates, “maximizing payments for phantom load reductions” from which the companies eventually collected more than $3.3 million. FERC seeks the return of that money as well as the fines.

In a statement released Thursday, Lincoln Paper & Tissue President and CEO Keith Van Scotter called the allegations false and misleading and said the company sees business continuing as usual despite the threatened fines.

The dispute has been ongoing for years. It arises, he said, from a lack of “meaningful guidance” from federal regulators and regulations or from officials who operate the New England power grid as to how the companies should operate.

“For a violation to be found, FERC must prove that Lincoln intentionally committed fraud to overstate its normal electricity usage. Lincoln had no such intent,” the statement reads. “Lincoln’s baseline-setting methodology was legitimate and economically sound” and “closely tracked the basic architecture of FERC’s own [regulations] on demand response compensation.”

Lincoln’s “‘expert’ enrolling participant” – a reference to CES – “failed to provide any instruction or guidance regarding how to set a baseline during the baseline-setting process,” Lincoln Paper & Tissue’s statement added.

Lincoln Paper has retained a law firm in Washington, D.C., to represent it in the matter, Van Scotter said.

The company has been in operation as Lincoln Paper & Tissue LLC since 2004. Located on Katahdin Avenue, Lincoln Paper and Tissue employs about 400 workers. They make deep-dyed tissue used by many of the nation’s party goods producers, airlines and food service companies to create napkins, towels, table covers and other specialty tissue products.

Source:  By Nick Sambides Jr., BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | bangordailynews.com 19 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.