[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Cape crusaders: Congressmen team up to probe FAA on turbine approval  

Credit:  By John Zaremba | www.bostonherald.com 18 July 2012 ~~

Two top GOP congressmen are launching a joint investigation into whether federal air-safety officials caved to political pressure when they approved the Cape Wind project – a probe that drew a sharp rebuke from the White House but only a shrug from the Patrick administration.

“It would be most troubling if FAA officials felt political pressure to approve the Cape Wind project despite both internal and external concerns over its safety,” reads the letter to the Federal Aviation Administration from Congressmen John Mica (R-Fla.) and Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), announcing their investigation yesterday. “And even more so if the FAA disregarded these safety concerns and made its decision because, as one manager stated, ‘It would be very difficult politically to refuse approval of this project,’ ”

News of the probe comes a month after the Herald and The Associated Press reported that internal FAA emails from the agency’s review of the risks to aircraft posed by the project’s 440-foot-tall spinning turbines show officials repeatedly referencing the political forces behind the nation’s would-be first-in-the-nation offshore wind farm.

Cape Wind opponents said that pressure led the FAA to downplay concerns about the power plant’s potential to interfere with radar and ensnare low-flying planes whose pilots fly by sight only. A federal appeals court ordered the FAA to redo its review in October, saying the agency didn’t sufficiently consider effects to those small aircraft.

Cape Wind, a 130-turbine wind project slated to be built about five miles off in Nantucket Sound, is a pet project of the Patrick administration, and it sits squarely within Obama’s green-power initiative.

Mica chairs the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and Issa heads the House Government Oversight and Reform Committee.

A White House spokesman said the president “believes that our country needs an energy strategy for the future – a safe, all-of-the-above strategy for the 21st century that develops every source of American-made energy. Rather than continuing to waste time and energy on politically motivated investigations that have turned up zero evidence of wrongdoing, House Republicans should focus on creating jobs and growing the economy.”

A spokeswoman for the Patrick administration said they weren’t surprised by news of the investigation.

Rick Sullivan, state secretary of energy and environmental affairs, issued a statement, saying, “This administration supports the Cape Wind project. This project has undergone thorough public review for over a decade to ensure it met state and federal public safety and environmental standards. It has been the subject of public hearings, federal and state permitting processes and the project’s approvals were recently upheld by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.” An FAA spokeswoman said the agency’s decision is expected soon and that it is reviewing the congressmen’s request for information.

Cape Wind spokesman Mark Rodgers said claims of political pressure in the FAA approval process have “no merits” and “should be summarily dismissed.” He said Cape Wind opponents made similar claims about a federal analysis of the project during the Bush administration.

“The only politics being applied to this important clean-energy project has been and continues to be on the part of project opponents,” Rodgers said.

Source:  By John Zaremba | www.bostonherald.com 18 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.