[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Romney surrogate says wind energy credit stance not set  

Credit:  By Ben Geman | E2 Wire | The Hill | thehill.com 11 July 2012 ~~

A surrogate for GOP White House hopeful Mitt Romney said Wednesday that the presumptive nominee wants to end the production tax credit for wind energy projects, but is still deciding how the popular incentive should be phased out.

Romney’s stance could be critical for the wind energy industry, which is lobbying hard to maintain the incentive that industry officials call vital to funding new power projects.

Linda Stuntz, an energy lobbyist who represented Romney at a Wednesday debate, said that as a general principle, Romney “thinks these kinds of technology-specific incentives are a bad idea.”

“He thinks that this is an illustration of one that has probably outlived its usefulness, but as to how it should be precisely would down – whether it should be a one-year [phase-out], whether it should be a longer period – he hasn’t come completely to ground on that,” Stuntz said of the wind tax credit, speaking at the debate in Washington, D.C., hosted by The Business Roundtable.

The wind incentive is slated to expire at year’s end and the Obama administration is calling on Congress to renew the credit, warning that the uncertainty is already prompting layoffs in the wind energy supply chain.

The White House is calling for a permanent extension, but is open to other timeframes as part of a deal to prevent the credit from lapsing.

But the credit’s future is highly uncertain on Capitol Hill. Installation of new wind power projects has fallen off sharply when the credit has lapsed, which last happened in 2004.

Stuntz is a founding partner of the Washington, D.C., law firm Stuntz, Davis & Staffier, P.C.

 Stuntz’s career includes service as deputy secretary of Energy under former President George H.W. Bush, and before that she served as minority counsel to the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

She traded blows on energy policy with Dan Reicher, a surrogate for the Obama campaign.

Stuntz noted Romney supports basic R&D into green technologies, including the Energy Department’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, or ARPA-E, while criticizing the Obama administration’s wider programs to spur commercialization of renewable energy sources.

“Government is bad at picking technology winners and losers. The U.S. should not be playing venture capitalist with taxpayer dollars conscripted from citizens,” Stuntz said.

Stuntz also revived allegations that the Obama administration imposes too many restrictions on fossil fuel development, alleging the U.S. oil-and-gas production boom is occurring “in spite of” the administration.

Reicher, representing Obama, defended the administration’s support for oil-and-gas development, and also cited support for nuclear power and endorsed administration investments in green energy projects, noting increases in renewable power generation in recent years.

Reicher, a Stanford University professor who until recently headed climate and energy initiatives for Google, and also served on Obama’s transition team, said Romney’s platform is too narrow.

“I think there is a number of areas where Governor Romney’s bet is on essentially being able to drill our way out of this. I don’t think the resources are there are overall, I don’t think it gives us the diversity of supply we need from a security perspective,” Reicher said, warning that Romney’s plans would cede green energy markets to China.

—This post was updated at 2:05 p.m.

Source:  By Ben Geman | E2 Wire | The Hill | thehill.com 11 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.