Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors; National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way, nor should it be implied that the writers endorse National Wind Watch.
Regulation can have complications
Credit: The Register-Guard | www.registerguard.com 29 June 2012 ~~
The news that the Emerald People’s Utility District is having to pay out $1 million more to purchase wind power than it receives for selling the power is the most recent example of unintended outcomes when government gets into writing rules for business.
The result of having to lay off workers to balance a budget most likely not was considered by the Oregon Legislature and Gov. Ted Kulongoski in 2007 when they passed Senate Bill 838, establishing required Renewable Portfolio Standards for electrical utilities.
SB 838 caused Oregon Revised Statute 469(a) to be generated, which requires “small utilities” to meet a threshold of 5 percent to 10 percent (depending upon sales volume) of “renewable” energy resources by 2025. That drove the utilities to enter into contracts with private enterprises for electricity from renewable sources such as wind and solar.
The entrepreneurs who develop such resources are driven by profit motives, and the contracts usually don’t allow for reductions in price or production. That leaves the contracting utilities with nonnegotiable expense requirements that often operate to their disadvantage.
I doubt that the Legislature or governor ever considered that their good intentions one day would cause people to lose their jobs, but it is an example of what often happens when government gets into regulating private business.
Some regulation is necessary, but more effort needs to be made at all levels to vet proposed regulations for unintended consequences. More often than not, government is the problem, not the solution.
Paul Reed
Eugene
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |
Share: