Ben Wyvis wind farm backlash is growing
Credit: Ross-shire Journal | www.ross-shirejournal.co.uk 29 June 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The dominant presence Ben Wyvis occupies in Ross-shire with communities to the west, south and east enjoying spectacular views of the Munro, has ensured it holds a special significance for locals.
Many wake up to a clear view of one of Scotland’s most recognisable mountains from their bedroom window and for motorists driving north through Ross-shire it is a commanding landmark.
The fondness locals and visitors alike feel for “the Ben” means it is often captured on canvas and film by its admirers.
The warmth many have for the mountain – described as the only Munro in Easter Ross – has resulted in emotive words such as “disfigured” and scarred” being used to describe what would happen to its landscape if a 17-turbine wind farm is built below it.
Environmental agencies, a community council and more than 200 individuals have all registered their objections to the proposed Clach Liath proposal, with some labelling it a “wind farm too far”.
They are concerned that the turbines will act as a “visual barrier” to Ben Wyvis, spoiling a view loved and enjoyed by so many and industrialising a distinctive, natural feature.
Strong voices have made the call for this mountain to be protected from further turbine developments, but with numerous previous wind farms getting the go-ahead in the face of strong local opposition, objectors must wonder if anyone is listening.
The recent rejection by the Scottish Government of a plan to build turbines in Caithness because of its negative impact on nearby properties and views of the landscape may give opponents to Clach Liath some hope.
In making the decision, Energy Minister Fergus Ewing said he was determined to see Scotland reap the benefits of renewable energy, but not at any cost.
Those who are against the Clach Liath Wind Farm will be hoping his claim that “the Scottish Government wants to see the right developments in the right places” will be remembered when that proposal is considered.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: