[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

The cost of being ‘green’  

Credit:  By Boston Herald Editorial Staff | www.bostonherald.com 22 June 2012 ~~

In the immortal words of Kermit the Frog “it’s not easy being green.”

And taxpayers are finding out it’s also not cheap. In fact, the public subsidies bestowed locally on companies like the now departed Evergreen Solar and the $535 million in federally backed loans to the now bankrupt Solyndra are only the two most obvious examples.

But it’s Cape Wind, the 130 turbines slated for the pristine waters of Nantucket Sound, that will be the gift that keeps on giving – doubling or tripling the cost of energy to local ratepayers. It has always been the wrong project in the wrong place and certainly at the wrong price.

But now at last the corners cut and whether agencies were bullied into submission may become the subject of a congressional probe – by the same congressman who has been all over the Solyndra scandal, Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.).

“It appears that an investigation is warranted in the case of Cape Wind to determine if the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] acted inappropriately due to political pressure from the [Obama] administration,” Stearns told the Herald.

“This is yet another example of this administration making dubious decisions based upon political considerations in pushing out these energy projects without conducting due diligence that would call into question their viability or value,” he noted.

The FAA and the Coast Guard had to certify that the project would not pose public safety risks – decisions which might now come under the scrutiny of the House Oversight Committee or the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Frankly we’re not fussy which group takes a second look at this pending nightmare for ratepayers. In its effort to make what then-state energy secretary Ian Bowles insisted would be “worldwide news,” common sense was left behind.

Perhaps congressional scrutiny can help set things right.

Source:  By Boston Herald Editorial Staff | www.bostonherald.com 22 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: